Heat Transfer: Finding T2 for a Cooled Stainless Steel Pipe

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a stainless steel hollow pipe containing saturated steam, where the objective is to find the temperature T2 while considering heat transfer through convection and radiation. A secondary question pertains to identifying whether a gas has transitioned to turbulent flow.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relevance of the given equations, questioning their derivation and applicability to the problem. There is uncertainty about the definitions of variables such as r1 and r2, and whether to ignore certain factors like radiation and convection in the calculations. Some participants suggest rearranging equations to isolate T2 and consider the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the equations and their origins. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Reynolds number for assessing flow conditions, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach to take for the heat transfer problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem lacks specificity, which complicates the application of the equations. There are references to different contexts, such as the type of flow (laminar vs turbulent) and the conditions under which the equations may apply.

FChebli
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement:

(a)Concider a stainless steel hollow pipe containing a saturated steam and has length L, cooled by convection & radiation. Find formula for T2.

(b) Another question "Not related to the previous one": How would I know if a gas has gone turbulent?

Homework Equations

:[/B]
For (a): Q = 2 Pai K (T1 - T2) / ln (r2 / r1)

For (b): Re = e u l / M ??

The Attempt at a Solution

:[/B]

(a) Do I ignore the saturated steam, and re-write the equation (a) with respect to T2 only??

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, where does that equation come from? In my previous work with convection, granted it was through a course in partial differential equations, I never had a convective formula work out so nicely. What is r2 and r1, is k Boltzmann's constant? Why does the problem give you length L when it doesn't appear in your formula?

Same with the second equation you posted. I'm guessing that most people on this site, maybe mechanical engineers excluded, will not know what your equations are and that's why you haven't been helped.
 
The equation comes from Fourir's law for convection.
K is the thermal conductivity (kW/mK) r2 is the outer radius (m) & r1 is the inner radius (m)...
Sorry for the typing mistake: Q = 2 Pai K L (T1 - T2) / ln (r2 / r1)

The second equation is Reynold's Number.
 
Ah, okay, after a bit of research I see where the first equation comes from.

Q = 2k \pi L \frac{T_1-T_2}{ln(r_2/r_1)}

Which is for conduction, not convection.

I suppose for your first question you are just supposed to rearrange the equation and solve for T2.

For the second question, use Reynold's number (are you using a pipe still?) too see if it is large. According to Wikipedia, 2100 < Re < 4000 is the general transition region for laminar to turbulent flow, so above 4000 and you should expect turbulent flow.

\mathrm{Re} = \frac{\rho V L}{\mu} = \frac{V L}{\nu} = \frac{Q L}{\nu A}
 
So for the first question, do I ignore what it says about radiation & convection?

For the second it's a flat plate... I've just asked my instructor via e-mail & he said that Reynold's number has to be above 10^5 to expect turbulet flow.

I appreciate your help, thank you!
 
I don't know, the problem isn't very specific. You may actually want to use a simpler equation such as

Q = h A \Delta T

where h is a convective heat transfer coefficient for air, A is the area of the pipe (2πrL) and T of course is temperature. I'm not really sure though without a better description of the problem, or the context of what your class has covered recently. Sorry, maybe someone else will know better.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K