I Heavy metals and semiconductors

bluejay27
Messages
67
Reaction score
3
Is there a list of semiconductors that are heavy metals?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rootone said:
Here is an extensive list of semiconductor materials.
Some of them are compounds of elements involving heavy metals.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_semiconductor_materials
The reason I was asking for a list of heavy metal semiconductors was because I wanted to know which ones would be toxic. I checked the wikipedia page but was unable to find which ones were toxic.
 
bluejay27 said:
The reason I was asking for a list of heavy metal semiconductors was because I wanted to know which ones would be toxic. I checked the wikipedia page but was unable to find which ones were toxic.

This is puzzling. Just because an element by itself is toxic doesn't mean that in a compound, it is still toxic. You do not want to ingest sodium and inhale chlorine separately, but in NaCl, it can be consumed.

There are no "heavy metal" semiconductors, because by definition they are not! There are, however, semiconductors that have been doped with them, or that they are part of a compound that form the semiconductor. The toxicity of the semiconductor cannot be determined simply by the presence of a heavy metal element, but this is true with most material, so one has to assume that you do not want to swallow any of them.

Look up the MSDS of a particular compound or material that you are curious about. If it is toxic, it will state it there.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top