Heine-Borel Theorem .... Sohrab, Theorem 4.1.10 .... ....

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Heine-Borel Theorem as presented in Houshang H. Sohrab's "Basic Real Analysis" (Second Edition), specifically regarding Theorem 4.1.10. Peter seeks clarification on the relationship between finite covers of compact sets, referencing Propositions 4.1.8 and 4.1.9. Olinguito confirms that while $$\mathcal{O}''$$ is a finite subcover of $$\mathcal{O}'$$, a finite subcover of $$\mathcal{O}$$ is necessary to establish the compactness of set K. This distinction is crucial for understanding the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Heine-Borel Theorem
  • Familiarity with compact sets in topology
  • Knowledge of finite covers and subcovers
  • Basic concepts from real analysis as presented in Sohrab's "Basic Real Analysis"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proofs of Propositions 4.1.8 and 4.1.9 in Sohrab's "Basic Real Analysis"
  • Learn about the implications of compactness in metric spaces
  • Explore the concept of open covers and their role in topology
  • Investigate additional examples of compact sets and their properties
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematicians focusing on topology, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of compactness and the Heine-Borel Theorem.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Houshang H. Sohrab's book: "Basic Real Analysis" (Second Edition).

I am focused on Chapter 4: Topology of [FONT=MathJax_AMS]R and Continuity ... ...

I need help in order to fully understand the proof of Theorem 4.1.10 ... ... Theorem 4.1.10 and its proof read as follows:
View attachment 9097
View attachment 9098
In the above proof by Sohrab we read the following:

" ... ...Since $$[a, b]$$ is compact (by Proposition 4.1.9) we can find a finite subcover $$\mathcal{O}'' \subset \mathcal{O}'$$ ... ..."My question is as follows:

If $$\mathcal{O}''$$ is a finite cover of $$[a, b]$$ then since $$K \subset [a, b]$$ surely $$\mathcal{O}'$$' is a finite cover of K also ... ... ?BUT ... Sohrab is concerned about whether or not $$\mathcal{O}' \in \mathcal{O}''$$ or not ... ...

Can someone please explain what is going on ...

Peter

========================================================================================The above post mentions Propositions 4.1.8 and 4.1.9 ... so I am providing text of the same ... as follows:
View attachment 9099
View attachment 9100
Hope that helps ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Sohrab - 1 - Theorem 4.1.10 ... ...   PART 1 ... .png
    Sohrab - 1 - Theorem 4.1.10 ... ... PART 1 ... .png
    8 KB · Views: 143
  • Sohrab - 2 - Theorem 4.1.10 ... ...   PART 2 ... .png
    Sohrab - 2 - Theorem 4.1.10 ... ... PART 2 ... .png
    8.3 KB · Views: 132
  • Sohrab - Proposition 4.1.8 ... .png
    Sohrab - Proposition 4.1.8 ... .png
    10.8 KB · Views: 169
  • Sohrab - Proposition 4.1.9 ... .png
    Sohrab - Proposition 4.1.9 ... .png
    14.6 KB · Views: 151
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter.

$\cal O^{\prime\prime}$ is only a finite subcover of $\cal O^\prime$. In order to prove $K$ compact, we need to find a finite subcover of $\cal O$. That’s what’s going on.
 
Olinguito said:
Hi Peter.

$\cal O^{\prime\prime}$ is only a finite subcover of $\cal O^\prime$. In order to prove $K$ compact, we need to find a finite subcover of $\cal O$. That’s what’s going on.
Thanks Olinguito ...

That clarified the matter ...

Most grateful for you help ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K