Undergrad Heisenberg Microscope: Exploring Single Photon Diffraction

Click For Summary
The Heisenberg Microscope thought experiment illustrates how a single photon interacts with an electron, leading to a diffraction pattern that reflects uncertainty in the electron's position. A single photon cannot create a diffraction pattern on its own; however, a series of photons can produce one. The discussion emphasizes that the interpretation of the diffraction pattern shifts significantly in quantum mechanics, where it represents the probability of detecting a photon at a specific location. This randomness in detection highlights the inherent uncertainty in pinpointing the electron's position. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the distinction between classical and quantum interpretations of light and measurement.
Axel Togawa
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
diffraction pattern generated in the thought experiment of Heisenberg
In the thought experiment proposed by Heisenberg, a single photon is scattered by the electron that we want to observe, and entering the microscope lens (the photon), it will create a diffraction pattern that gives the uncertainty on the position according to the law of optics. I wanted to ask how the single photon could create a diffraction figure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Axel Togawa said:
I wanted to ask how the single photon could create a diffraction figure?
It can't, not if you're considering a single photon.

Threads like this are the reason Physics Forums generally encourages people to include the sources that they've using. Without knowing that, we have no way of knowing whether you've misunderstood the explanation or the explanation was bad. So if you could tell us more about your starting point, you'll get more and more helpful answers.
 
  • Like
Likes Axel Togawa
A single photon will not create a diffraction pattern. Your links don't say that either.

A succession of many single photons can create a diffraction pattern.
 
  • Informative
Likes Axel Togawa
Ok thank you fro the answer
 
You can well argue with a single photon. It's only the meaning of the diffraction pattern which changes in a "revolutionary way". The diffraction pattern is of course a "wave phenomenon", i.e., it occurs when using classical em. waves or many single photons.

The important "revolutionary" change between classical electromagnetism and quantum electrodynamics is the meaning of this diffraction pattern when considering the case of a single photon: According to the Born rule of quantum theory the diffraction pattern depicts the probability of the single photon to hit the screen at a given place. The uncertainty of the position of the electron using a single photon is due to the randomness of the position where this photon is detected, i.e., you cannot trace back in a one-to-one connection the position of the electron which scattered the photon from the place where the photon was detected.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
641
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K