Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and its application to two unnormalized wave functions, Y1(x) and Y2(x). Participants analyze which wave function exhibits greater localization in position by calculating the integrals A, ⟨x⟩, and ⟨x²⟩ over a finite interval (-L/2 to L/2). The uncertainty in position, Δx, is derived from these calculations, emphasizing the relationship between position and momentum as dictated by the principle. The implications of taking L to infinity are also explored, impacting the convergence of integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
  • Knowledge of integral calculus and its application in physics
  • Basic concepts of quantum state normalization
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the normalization constant for the wave functions Y1(x) and Y2(x)
  • Explore the implications of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the effects of infinite boundaries on wave function behavior
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of the uncertainty relation ΔxΔp ≥ ħ/2
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as researchers interested in wave function analysis and the implications of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

jap33
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
given 2 unnormalized wave functions:

Y1(x)=e^i(x/m)

Y2(x)=1/2*[e^2i(x/m) + e^3i(x/m) + e^-2i(x/m) + e^-3i(x/m)]

if the positions of the particles were measured, which would be found to be more localized in space? (that is, which has a position known more precisely?)

to my understanding, i understand the principle if you know position specifically, then you know nothing about the momentum, etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Take the x-axis to be of finite extent ( [itex]-L/2 \le x \le L/2[/itex]). this will make all your integrals converge. Then evaluate:

[tex] A = \int_{-L/2}^{L/2}{|\psi(x)|^{2} \, dx}[/tex]

[tex] A \, \langle x \rangle = \int_{-L/2}^{L/2}{x \, |\psi(x)|^{2} \, dx}[/tex]

[tex] A \, \langle x^{2} \rangle = \int_{-L/2}^{L/2}{x^{2} \, |\psi(x)|^{2} \, dx}[/tex]

Then, once you have calcualated [itex]\langle x \rangle[/itex] and [itex]\langle x^{2} \rangle[/itex], you can evaluate the uncertainty in the position by:

[tex] \Delta x = \sqrt{\langle (\Delta x)^{2} \rangle} = \sqrt{\langle x^{2} \rangle - \langle x \rangle^{2}}[/tex]

What happens to this number if you set [itex]L \rightarrow \infty[/itex]?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
974
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K