A Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation for mixed states

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the Heisenberg uncertainty relation for mixed states using the established proof for pure states. It emphasizes that adding statistical uncertainty to quantum uncertainty should not reduce the uncertainty in observables, but rather increase it. The proof for mixed states involves using the density matrix and properties of self-adjoint operators, leading to the conclusion that the uncertainty relation holds universally. A participant notes that while the proof for mixed states mirrors that of pure states, it requires a different approach rather than simply repeating the previous proof. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexity of transitioning from pure to mixed states in quantum mechanics.
Jamister
Messages
58
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
proving the Heisenberg uncertainty relations for mixed states
How do you prove Heisenberg uncertainty relations for mixed states (density matrix), only from knowing the relation is true for pure states?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can prove it for any state. Let ##\hat{A}## and ##\hat{B}## be the self-adjoint operators representing observables and assume for simplicity that ##\langle A \rangle=\langle B \rangle=0##, where ##\langle \hat{A} \rangle=\mathrm{Tr}(\hat \rho \hat{A})##. Since ##\hat{\rho}## is a positive semi-definite self-adjoint operator there's a complete orthonormalized eigenbasis ##|u_n \rangle##, i.e.,
$$\hat{\rho}=\sum_n p_n |u_n \rangle \langle u_n |.$$
Thus any expectation value reads
$$\langle A \rangle = \mathrm{Tr} (\hat{\rho} \hat{A}) = \sum_{n} \langle u_n| \rho_n \hat{A} |u_n \rangle = \sum_n P_n \langle u_n |\hat{A}| u_n \rangle.$$
Now apply this to the self-adjoint operator
$$\hat{C}=(\hat{A}-\mathrm{i} \lambda \hat{B})(\hat{A}+\mathrm{i} \lambda \hat{B}), \quad \lambda \in \mathbb{R}.$$
First of all
$$\langle u_n|\hat{C}| u_n \rangle=\langle (\hat{A}+\mathrm{i} \lambda \hat{B}) u_n|(\hat{A}+\mathrm{i} \lambda \hat{B}) u_n \rangle \geq 0.$$
And since ##P_n \geq 0## for all ##n## you also have
$$P(\lambda)=\langle (\hat{A}-\mathrm{i} \lambda \hat{B})(\hat{A}+\mathrm{i} \lambda \hat{B}) \rangle \geq 0.$$
Multiplying this out gives
$$P(\lambda) = \langle A^2 \rangle + \langle \mathrm{i} [\hat{A},\hat{B}] \rangle \lambda + \lambda^2 \langle \hat{B}^2 \rangle.$$
Now ##\langle A^2 \rangle=\Delta A^2## and ##\langle B^2 \rangle=\Delta B^2## are the variances of ##A## and ##B## (because we assumed ##\langle A \rangle=\langle B \rangle=0##), i.e.,
$$P(\lambda)=\lambda^2 \Delta B^2 + \lambda \langle \mathrm{i} [\hat{A},\hat{B}]\rangle + \Delta A^2 \geq 0$$
für ##\lambda \geq 0##. Now ##P(\lambda)## is a real quadratic polynomial and thus its discriminant fulfills,
$$\frac{1}{4} \langle \mathrm{i} [\hat{A},\hat{B}] \rangle^2 - \Delta A^2 \Delta B^2 \leq 0,$$
and from this finally
$$\Delta A \Delta B \geq \frac{1}{2} |\langle \mathrm{i} [\hat{A},\hat{B}] \rangle|,$$
which is the Heisenberg-Robertson uncertainty relation.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DrChinese, hilbert2 and PeroK
vanhees71 said:
You can prove it for any state. Let ##\hat{A}## and ##\hat{B}## be the self-adjoint operators representing observables and assume for simplicity that ##\langle A \rangle=\langle B \rangle=0##, where ##\langle \hat{A} \rangle=\mathrm{Tr}(\hat \rho \hat{A})##. Since ##\hat{\rho}## is a positive semi-definite self-adjoint operator there's a complete orthonormalized eigenbasis ##|u_n \rangle##, i.e.,
$$\hat{\rho}=\sum_n p_n |u_n \rangle \langle u_n |.$$
Thus any expectation value reads
$$\langle A \rangle = \mathrm{Tr} (\hat{\rho} \hat{A}) = \sum_{n} \langle u_n| \rho_n \hat{A} |u_n \rangle = \sum_n P_n \langle u_n |\hat{A}| u_n \rangle.$$
Now apply this to the self-adjoint operator
$$\hat{C}=(\hat{A}-\mathrm{i} \lambda \hat{B})(\hat{A}+\mathrm{i} \lambda \hat{B}), \quad \lambda \in \mathbb{R}.$$
First of all
$$\langle u_n|\hat{C}| u_n \rangle=\langle (\hat{A}+\mathrm{i} \lambda \hat{B}) u_n|(\hat{A}+\mathrm{i} \lambda \hat{B}) u_n \rangle \geq 0.$$
And since ##P_n \geq 0## for all ##n## you also have
$$P(\lambda)=\langle (\hat{A}-\mathrm{i} \lambda \hat{B})(\hat{A}+\mathrm{i} \lambda \hat{B}) \rangle \geq 0.$$
Multiplying this out gives
$$P(\lambda) = \langle A^2 \rangle + \langle \mathrm{i} [\hat{A},\hat{B}] \rangle \lambda + \lambda^2 \langle \hat{B}^2 \rangle.$$
Now ##\langle A^2 \rangle=\Delta A^2## and ##\langle B^2 \rangle=\Delta B^2## are the variances of ##A## and ##B## (because we assumed ##\langle A \rangle=\langle B \rangle=0##), i.e.,
$$P(\lambda)=\lambda^2 \Delta B^2 + \lambda \langle \mathrm{i} [\hat{A},\hat{B}]\rangle + \Delta A^2 \geq 0$$
für ##\lambda \geq 0##. Now ##P(\lambda)## is a real quadratic polynomial and thus its discriminant fulfills,
$$\frac{1}{4} \langle \mathrm{i} [\hat{A},\hat{B}] \rangle^2 - \Delta A^2 \Delta B^2 \leq 0,$$
and from this finally
$$\Delta A \Delta B \geq \frac{1}{2} |\langle \mathrm{i} [\hat{A},\hat{B}] \rangle|,$$
which is the Heisenberg-Robertson uncertainty relation.
but you proved it from the beginning. how do you prove it by using the assumption from pure states, and not repeating the all process again
 
  • Sad
Likes PeroK
hilbert2 said:
I wouldn't expect the uncertainty in any observable to get smaller by adding statistical uncertainty to the already existing quantum uncertainty in the position and momentum. It can only increase.

There's something said about this on page 16 here: https://www.univie.ac.at/nuhag-php/dateien/talks/1073_NuHAG_WPI_2008.pdf
I don't think it's obvious
 
Jamister said:
but you proved it from the beginning. how do you prove it by using the assumption from pure states, and not repeating the all process again
You only get one proof for free! If you want another one, you have to show some effort yourself.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Vanadium 50, hutchphd and 3 others
Jamister said:
but you proved it from the beginning. how do you prove it by using the assumption from pure states, and not repeating the all process again
For pure states the proof is almost the same. You just set one of the ##p_n=1## and all others to 0.