Heisenberg's uncertainty principle

bmrick
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So here's the question

An electron is confined within a region of width 1 X 10^-10 meters.
Estimate the uncertainty in the x component of the electrons momentum


Homework Equations


ΔPΔx[itex]\geq[/itex](1/2)(h/2pi)



The Attempt at a Solution


The problem appears pretty straight forward. But my teacher has the solution as using the equation
ΔPΔx[itex]\geq[/itex]h/2pi
So I'm lost as to why he got rid of the one half. I looked at the problem thinking, oh this is simple, and then after seeing that he did that I literally have no idea where to start. Can someone explain?
 
on Phys.org
i should add, there is a diagram that shows the length restriction on the electron to be in the y direction
 
The point is that the Heisenberg uncertainty relation is valid for any quantum state of the particle. It reads
[tex]\Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}.[/tex]
One can also show that the only (pure) states, were the equality sign holds are Gaussian wave functions.

Here the question is a bit different. It says "the particle is constraint within a region of [itex]10^{-10} \; \mathrm{m}[/itex]". A bit idealized this means it's trapped in a potential pot with infinitely high walls on an interval of this length.

Unfortunately the question is very vague, and the answer is not unique. What might be behind the question is to estimate the above uncertainty product for the bound states of the so trapped particles in the potential pot (of course with infinitely high walls, there are only bound-state solutions of the energy-eigenvalue problem).

So I guess, what's supposed to be done is to evaluate the energy eigensolutions and then (falsely, but that's another pretty subtle issue!) to assume that the momentum operator is given by the usual expression [itex]\hat{p}=-\mathrm{i}\hbar \mathrm{d}_x[/itex] and evaluate the standard deviation for both position and momentum for the particle in the energy eigenstates and check the uncertainty relation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K