Hello i'm new over here Hope i'm writing where it should be

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter abel_ghita
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hello Writing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation x = tangent(x) and the points of intersection between the tangent function and its inverse, arctangent. Participants explore the existence of solutions, methods for approximation, and related mathematical concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster (OP) seeks the solutions to the equation x = tangent(x) and notes that the intersections of tangent and arctangent should lie on the first bisector due to their symmetry.
  • One participant identifies 0 as an obvious solution but suggests that the other two solutions cannot be found explicitly, comparing it to the equation x = cos(x).
  • Another participant expresses interest in approximating the other solutions and inquires about the Newton-Raphson method for finding these approximations.
  • A later reply questions the approximation provided by the OP, specifically regarding the value of ±1.5708, pointing out that this does not align with the behavior of tangent at π/2.
  • One participant asserts that the equation x = arctan(x) has only one real solution at x = 0, supported by a discussion of the derivatives of the functions involved.
  • Another participant introduces a different equation, x = arctan(2x), which they claim has three solutions, and relates it to the mean field Ising model in statistical physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that 0 is a solution to the equation x = tangent(x), but there is disagreement regarding the existence and nature of the other solutions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact values of these solutions and the methods for approximating them.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the behavior of the tangent and arctangent functions, particularly near critical points like π/2. The discussion also highlights the dependence on the definitions of the functions and the potential for multiple solutions in related equations.

abel_ghita
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
hello! I'm new over here.. Hope I'm writing where it should be written.
What is the solution of
x=tangent(x)
?
Well.. in fact I'm looking for the point where the graphs of function tangent and its inverse, arctangent, intersect each other (if we plot them on the same coordinated frame)... These three points of intersection must be on the first bisector, as we know that these two functions are symmetric with respect to the first bisector.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well, 0 is an obvious answer. But I don't think you'll find the other two points explicitely. This is not unusual, the equation x=cos(x) also has no known explicit solution.

However, you can very easily approximate the answer by Newton-Rhapson or similar algorithms...
 


Thanks!
Yes..those two other solutions were my problem...Newton-Rhapson?? i didn't even hear about this so far.. but i'll search for it... In the mean time.. could you find this approximation for me?
Thanks!:wink:
 


abel_ghita said:
Thanks!
Yes..those two other solutions were my problem...Newton-Rhapson?? i didn't even hear about this so far.. but i'll search for it... In the mean time.. could you find this approximation for me?
Thanks!:wink:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=x=arctan(x)&lk=4&num=2

so I guess +-1.5708
 


Are you sure? Pi/2 and Tangent(Pi/2) are not close... (and notice what happens

at Pi/2 )
 


Funny that this was revived by the OP after more than a year since the last reply.

At any rate, ##x = \arctan(x)## only has one real solution, x = 0. You can prove this by looking at the derivatives: the derivative of x is of course 1, and you can show that away from x = 0 the derivative of arctan(x) is always less than one, so there will not be any intersections between the two curves except at x = 0.

However, an equation like ##x = \arctan(2x)## does have three solutions.

A similar equation, ##m = \tanh(2z\beta J m)##, arises when solving the mean field Ising model for the magnetization m, demonstrating that there exists a phase transition from a paramagnet, corresponding to m = 0, to a ferromagnet, ##m \neq 0##.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K