Help Needed Solving For Two Scalars Such That au + bw = v

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jack Bateman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalars
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding scalars a and b such that the equation v = au + bw holds true, with v specified as <1, 1>. The participants are exploring the implications of this equation in the context of vector representation and linear combinations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various attempts to solve for a and b, including guess and check methods. Some question the notation used for vectors and the feasibility of adding scalars to form a vector. Others suggest that the problem may require specific definitions for u and w to find a unique solution.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the nature of the problem. Some have offered generalized forms for solving the equation, while others emphasize the importance of knowing the vectors u and w to determine the scalars a and b. There is no explicit consensus on the solution, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of information regarding the vectors u and w, which is critical for determining the scalars a and b. Participants highlight that the existence of a solution may depend on whether u and w form a basis for R2.

Jack Bateman
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find a and b such that v= au + bw given that v = <1, 1>



Homework Equations


v = au + bw, v = <1,1>


The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to solve for the appropriate values via guess and check, but it hasn't worked out. I cannot find a proportion either through fractional or integer values that satisfy the equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
couldnt a be (1,1)/u?
 
I am not quite sure what you mean. The values of a and b must be scalars.
 
to be honest I've never seen the <> notation but i assume that means a vector. But how can you add two scalars to get a vector?
 
This particular notation denotes a vector in component form. The initial point is the origin. The point given indicates the terminal point.
 
Is there a generalized form that I could use to solve for two different scalars? Every system of equations I try to create is fundamentally flawed in some way.
 
Heres a generalized problem that might help. Just plug and chug your numbers. You should be provided with u and w values.

Heres my example
v= <2,1> (here you'd put <1,1>. i just don't feel like resolving it) v=<1,2> (i+2j) and w=<-1,1> (i-j)

therefore v=2i+j (<2,1> corresponds to the <i,j> coeffs)
so set the two sides equal to each other.
2i + j = a(i + 2j) + b(i - j)
2i + j = (a + b)i + (2a - b)j
simplify and you get
2=a+b and 1=2a-b
Solve and you get a=1 and b=1

If you need anymore help email me. :]
 
Jack Bateman said:

Homework Statement



Find a and b such that v= au + bw given that v = <1, 1>



Homework Equations


v = au + bw, v = <1,1>


The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to solve for the appropriate values via guess and check, but it hasn't worked out. I cannot find a proportion either through fractional or integer values that satisfy the equation.
What are u and w? This makes no sense without knowing that. For some u and w, there will not exist such a and b. Assuming that u and w form a basis for R2, there must be unique a and b but they depend on what u and w are.

If, for example, u= <1, 0> and w= <0, 1> then a= b= 1. If u= <1, 1> and v= <1, -1) then a= 1 and b= 0.

If you are supposed to give some general formula, then let [itex]u= <u_1, u_2>[/itex] and [itex]w= <w_1, w_2>[/itex] then au+ bw= v becomes [itex]a<u_1, u_2>+ b<w_1, w_2>[/itex][itex]= <au_1+ bw_1, au_2+ bw_2>= <1, 1>[/itex] so we must have [itex]au_1+ bw_1= 1[/itex] and [itex]au_2+ bw_2= 1[/itex]. Solve those equations for a and b. Of course, the solution will involve a denominator of [itex]u_1w_2- u_2w_1[/itex]. There will be a solution if and only if that is not 0, exactly the condition that u and w form a basis.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K