Help on solar powered car's power source

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the power source for a solar-powered toy car intended for a racing competition. Participants explore the use of converging lenses to concentrate sunlight onto a single power cell, examining different configurations and their potential effectiveness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using a single converging lens on top of the power cell, while another suggests using multiple lenses around the cell to maximize sunlight concentration.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the effectiveness of lenses, arguing that they may not increase the total light received by the solar cell and could instead occupy space that could be used for additional solar cells.
  • Another participant mentions the competition's restriction to a single power cell, justifying the use of lenses to focus light on it for increased electricity generation.
  • A suggestion is made to consider using a large, plastic Fresnel lens, which might be lightweight and effective.
  • Concerns are raised about the thermal limitations of the solar cell when using lenses, with a recommendation to measure intensity at the focal point to avoid overheating.
  • Participants discuss the efficiency loss of solar cells due to temperature increases, noting specific percentages for different types of cells.
  • A curiosity is expressed about the potential benefits of super-cooling the solar cell to enhance its output temporarily.
  • Weight considerations are highlighted, emphasizing the need to balance lens weight against the overall performance of the car.
  • Discussion includes the concept of an optimum operating point for solar cells and the complexity of maintaining that point with additional circuitry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the use of lenses and their effectiveness. While some support the idea of using lenses, others question their utility and raise concerns about efficiency and weight. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various assumptions regarding the competition's rules, the characteristics of solar cells, and the implications of temperature on efficiency. There are unresolved questions about the optimal configuration for the power source and the potential trade-offs involved.

Lonely Stark
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
< Mentor Note -- thread moved to HH from the technical engineering forums, so no HH Template is shown >[/color]

I have taken part in a competition about solar car racing recently. The car I am going to make is just as big as a toy car. I have some problems about it's power source.
I am going to use converging lens to concentrate sunlight to my power cell and I have think of two ways to do it:
First, I will use one converging lens place on top of my power cell
Two, instead of using one, i will use about five of them to place around the power cell to get as many sunlight as possible.
I want to know which one is better and their output current (DC) so I can buy a proper engine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach is a bit confusing to me. I would think that lenses would seriously decrease the effectiveness of the solar cells. After all, they don't in any way increase the amount of light impinging upon them—merely the intensity. Using the cm3 of area that the lenses would occupy by filling it with more cells would be weight-saving and collect more light.
Am I missing something?
 
Danger said:
Your approach is a bit confusing to me. I would think that lenses would seriously decrease the effectiveness of the solar cells. After all, they don't in any way increase the amount of light impinging upon them—merely the intensity. Using the cm3 of area that the lenses would occupy by filling it with more cells would be weight-saving and collect more light.
Am I missing something?
You are not missing anything but in the competition, we can use only one power cell which is given by the organizer so I have to make the most out of it. That's why I decided to use lenses. Because lenses are use to concentrate light in an area, I think it would be better to use them to focus light into my power cell so it can generate more electricity. In my opinion, I don't think lenses would decrease the effectiveness of the solar power cell
 
Lonely Stark said:
You are not missing anything but in the competition, we can use only one power cell which is given by the organizer so I have to make the most out of it. That's why I decided to use lenses. Because lenses are use to concentrate light in an area, I think it would be better to use them to focus light into my power cell so it can generate more electricity. In my opinion, I don't think lenses would decrease the effectiveness of the solar power cell
Have you considered using a large, plastic Fresnel lens?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lonely Stark
Given the circumstances, I agree with Vagn's suggestion. Be very careful, though, to measure the intensity at the focal point before operation to make sure that it doesn't exceed the thermal limitations of the cell. You'll go nowhere fast if you melt the thing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lonely Stark
Also bear in mind that solar cells lose efficiency as their temperature rises.

The output of a solar cell, and therefore a solar panel, is affected by its temperature. As a result the power output will be reduced by between 0.25%(amorphous cells) and 0.5%(most crystalline cells) for each degree C of temperature rise.
Panel temperatures in the summer in warm climates can easily reach 50oC resulting in a 12% reduction in output compared to the rated output at 25oC.

http://www.solar-facts.com/panels/panel-efficiency.php
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lonely Stark and Danger
edward said:
Also bear in mind that solar cells lose efficiency as their temperature rises.
I was unaware of that, Edward. Thanks for putting it out there.
 
Thank you guys for giving me a lot of useful informations. I didn't know that solar cells lose efficiency due to temperature. I thought they just overheated and melted.
 
curiosity question: if you mount the cell on a super-cooled (Dipped in liquid nitrogen) light-weight metal backer would that actually increase the cells output for the time it takes the metal to reach ambient temp?
 
  • #10
Weight.

A plastic fresnel lens might be light enough to have minimal impact on the weight and therefore speed and distance of the car, but you will reach a point of diminishing returns. You must factor in the weight cost of any complexity you add.
 
  • #12
Solar cells have an optimum operating point. If you plot power out against load resistance you will probably find the graph has a maximum power output at a particular value of load. The position of that peak will vary depending on the brightness. Ideally you need to insert a circuit between the motor and cell that keeps the cell at it's optimum operating point. However such a circuit is quite complex and might be beyond the skill level expected of competitors.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K