Help regarding normalization of wave functions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization of wave functions in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on two wave functions: ψ(x) = Bexp(ikx) for x between 0 and L, and ψ(x) = Bexp(−kx) for x between 0 and ∞. Participants explore the concept of normalization, the necessary conditions for a wave function to be normalized, and the integration required to find the normalization constant B.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help with normalizing two specific wave functions and expresses uncertainty about the process.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on what it means for a function to be normalized and what properties it must satisfy.
  • A participant suggests that the normalization condition involves setting |ψ(x)|² equal to one, which is later corrected by others.
  • Several participants emphasize the importance of integrating the square of the wave function over the appropriate domain to achieve normalization.
  • There is a discussion about how to handle the second wave function, with one participant questioning whether to replace "-k" with "i²k" and another clarifying that the wave function is real and can be integrated directly.
  • One participant shares their results for the normalization constants B for both wave functions and asks for validation.
  • Another participant confirms the correctness of the results provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the process of normalization and the need for integration, but there are differing views on the initial steps and interpretations of the normalization condition. The discussion remains somewhat unresolved regarding the initial approach to normalization.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express varying levels of familiarity with quantum mechanics, which may influence their understanding of the normalization process. There is also a lack of consensus on the initial normalization condition before integration.

legend
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi, i need some help regarding normalization of a wave function, i feel it is a very simple problem, but i am having a hard time figuring it out. I would really appreciate it if anybody could help me out a bit regarding this.

I need to normalize the following wavefunctions by figuring out the constant B.

(1) ψ(x) = Bexp(ikx) where ψ(x) is non‐zero between x=0 and x=L ;
(2) ψ(x) = Bexp(−kx) where ψ(x) is non‐zero between x=0 and x=∞

Thanks a lot in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what it means for a function to be normalized? What equation or property does a normalized function have to satisfy?
 
|ψ(x)|² = 1

So legend square both sides, set |ψ(x)|² equal to one. then solve for B
 
Thanks a lot dacruick.

@jtbell... actually i have some vague idea, i am still in the process of coming to terms with quantum mechanics (i don't have a physics background :-( )
 
dacruick said:
|ψ(x)|² = 1
Wrong.
 
dacruick said:
|ψ(x)|² = 1

No, you also have to integrate. In general:

[tex]\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}{|\psi(x)|^2 dx}<br /> = \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}{\psi^*(x)\psi(x) dx} = 1[/tex]

In this case, one actually has to integrate only over the region where [itex]\psi(x)[/itex] is non-zero.
 
jtbell said:
No, you also have to integrate. In general:

[tex]\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}{|\psi(x)|^2 dx}<br /> = \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}{\psi^*(x)\psi(x) dx} = 1[/tex]

In this case, one actually has to integrate only over the region where [itex]\psi(x)[/itex] is non-zero.

If [tex]\psi(x)[/tex] is a period wave with period L or it is in a box

[tex]\int^{+L}_{0}{|\psi(x)|^2 dx}<br /> = \int^{+L}_{0}{\psi^*(x)\psi(x) dx} = 1[/tex]
 
Thanks a lot for your answers. I have one doubt.

How do i go about the second function i.e Bexp(−kx)? Do i replace "-k" by "i²k" and proceed?
 
The wave function is real so [tex]\psi=\psi^*=Be^{-kx}[/tex]. Just integrate as it is and you'll be fine. (Replacing [tex]-k\to i^2k[/tex] will also give the correct answer because it actually does nothing. You don't have to do that.)
 
  • #10
Thanks a lot to all of you guys for your help. So i solved them and got the following results. Could anyone please let me know if they are correct?
For number 1 : B = 1/(√L)
For number 2 : B = √(2k)
 
  • #11
Yes, they are correct.
 
  • #12
Thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K