Help Request QHO series method from Griffiths

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
relativist
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I Uwould be grateful if anybody can kindly help me with this particular doubt that cropped when I was working through Introduction to Quantum Mchanics by Griffiths ( Griffiths page 66 )

My question is how is the following obtained :

aj = C / (J/2)! ( Please read j as subscript of a )

I would be grateful to anybody who who can clarify my doubt.

Thanks

Relativist
 
Physics news on Phys.org
George Jones said:
In my copy of Griffiths, this is on pages 53-54.

What do you get when use j = 2 in

[tex]a_{j+2} = \frac{2}{j} a_j?[/tex]

j = 4? j = 6? j = 8?

Thanks for your reply. But this leads to

a10 = a2 / 4! when it should be a10 = a2 / 5! according to aj = C / (j / 2)!. Can you please tell me how this can be approximately coorect when we are considering large values of j. I worked for j = 100 and found a2 / 49 ! when it should be a2 / 50.

Regards,

Relativist
 
Okay, how about reworking the argument in Griffiths as follows.

Consider the series

[tex]h \left( x \right) = \sum^\infty_{j=0} a_j x^j[/tex]

with

[tex]a_{j+2} = \frac{2}{j} a_j[/tex]

for large [itex]j[/itex]. Now consider

[tex]e^{x^2} = \sum^\infty_{n=0} \frac{x^{2n}}{n!} = \sum^\infty_{n=0} c_{2n} x^{2n},[/tex]

so, for large [itex]j[/itex],

[tex]c_{j+2} = \frac{2}{j} c_j.[/tex]

Therefore, asymptotically, [itex]h \left( x \right)[/itex] looks like [tex]e^{x^2}[/tex].
 
Thanks very much for the clear explanation. I can see it now.

Thanks once again for your time.

Regards,

Relativist