MHB Help solving/proofing an Integral Equation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the equality of both sides of a specific integral equation involving the function f(t, x) = x^4 - 6tx^2 + 3t^2. The application of Ito's lemma is utilized to derive the differential form, leading to the conclusion that d(X_t^4 - 6tX_t^2 + 3t^2) equals (4X_t^3 - 12tX_t) dX_t. The participants express gratitude for the assistance and indicate a willingness to further explore the solution provided. This exchange highlights the collaborative effort to understand complex integral equations in stochastic calculus.
cdbsmith
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Need help showing that both sides of the following integral are equal. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Q2 - Integral Proof.png
    Q2 - Integral Proof.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 95
Physics news on Phys.org
cdbsmith said:
Need help showing that both sides of the following integral are equal. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Since the integral equation is given (and assuming $X_0 = 0$), it suffices to show

$\displaystyle d(X_t^4 - 6tX_t^2 + 3t^2) = (4X_t^3 - 12tX_t)\, dX_t$.

To do this, set $f(t, x) = x^4 - 6tx^2 + 3t^2$ and apply Ito's lemma to get

$\displaystyle df(t, X_t) = \left(f_t + \frac{f_{xx}}{2}\right) dt + f_x \, dX_t$,

$\displaystyle df(t, X_t) = \left(-6X_t^2 + 6t + \frac{12X_t^2 - 12t}{2}\right) dt + (4X_t^3 - 12tX_t)\, dX_t$,

$\displaystyle df(t, X_t) = (-6X_t^2 + 6t + 6X_t^2 - 6t)\, dt + (4X_t^3 - 12tX_t)\, dX_t$,

$\displaystyle df(t, X_t) = 0\, dt + (4X_t^3 - 12tX_t)\, dX_t$,

$\displaystyle d(X_t^4 - 6tX_t^2 + 3t^2) = (4X_t^3 - 12tX_t)\, dX_t$.
 
Euge said:
Since the integral equation is given (and assuming $X_0 = 0$), it suffices to show

$\displaystyle d(X_t^4 - 6tX_t^2 + 3t^2) = (4X_t^3 - 12tX_t)\, dX_t$.

To do this, set $f(t, x) = x^4 - 6tx^2 + 3t^2$ and apply Ito's lemma to get

$\displaystyle df(t, X_t) = \left(f_t + \frac{f_{xx}}{2}\right) dt + f_x \, dX_t$,

$\displaystyle df(t, X_t) = \left(-6X_t^2 + 6t + \frac{12X_t^2 - 12t}{2}\right) dt + (4X_t^3 - 12tX_t)\, dX_t$,

$\displaystyle df(t, X_t) = (-6X_t^2 + 6t + 6X_t^2 - 6t)\, dt + (4X_t^3 - 12tX_t)\, dX_t$,

$\displaystyle df(t, X_t) = 0\, dt + (4X_t^3 - 12tX_t)\, dX_t$,

$\displaystyle d(X_t^4 - 6tX_t^2 + 3t^2) = (4X_t^3 - 12tX_t)\, dX_t$.

Thanks, Euge!

I'm going to study your solution and try to understand it. I will let you know if I get stuck on something.

Thanks again!
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.