Help taking a cross product of a matrix

Click For Summary
Taking the cross product of two matrices is not standard and lacks a clear definition, unlike the cross product of vectors. The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding the application of cross products in the context of tensors, particularly in fluid mechanics. The user seeks clarification after their professor mentioned crossing and dotting tensors, suggesting that this may be a specialized topic. The conversation indicates a need for further explanation in academic settings regarding tensor operations. Overall, the concept of a cross product for matrices remains ambiguous and requires more context for proper understanding.
member 428835
hey all

well the title says it all. if i want to take the cross product of two matrices, how do i do it? any help, advice, etc. is very appreciated!

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think there's a standard definition for the cross product of two matrices. How do you think that would work, or what would it mean (e.g. the cross product of two vectors gives a vector perpendicular to both; what would the cross product of two linear transformations be)?
 
I'll take a stab: why do you want to take the cross product of two matrices, assuming such an animal exists?
 
hey guys! ok, so let me explain the situation: I am in a graduate fluid mechanics course and we are dealing with tensors, which are matrices. my professor was reviewing div, del, grad, and the rest of the operators with the kronecker delta and permutation epsilon. he did mention crossing two tensors! he also mentions "dotting" or taking the dot product, of two tensors. but it seems if this is not a "thing" maybe he will elaborate in tomorrow's lecture?

thanks for both your helps! this explains why google couldn't really help me either
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K