Help to simplify a difficult equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter diffrac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying a complex equation involving logarithmic and exponential functions, specifically in the context of constants related to physics. The original poster seeks assistance in transforming the equation to isolate a variable, v, which represents a physical quantity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods to simplify the equation, including applying the exponential function and manipulating logarithmic properties. Some participants question the initial steps taken, suggesting alternative approaches such as multiplying both sides by a constant.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen participants sharing their attempts and reasoning, with some providing guidance on potential pitfalls in exponent rules. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations and methods, with no explicit consensus reached on a single approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the equation and the potential for common mistakes related to the properties of exponents and logarithms. The original poster and others express uncertainty about their steps and seek clarification on specific transformations.

diffrac
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Could someone please help me simplify the equation:

\frac{-1}{(c1+c2)} \cdot ln [(m1-m2)g-(c1+c2)v] = \frac{t}{(m1+m2)} - \frac{1}{(c1+c2)} \cdot ln[(m1-m2)g]

(where c1, c2, m1, m2, g, are constants)

so as to get: v = \frac{(m1-m2)g}{(c1+c2)} \cdot [ 1 - exp[\frac{-(c1+c2)t }{(m1+m2)}]] (teacher's solution)?


I tried several ways to solve the equation for v (applying e^ to it), but all i can seem to get is:

v = [exp\frac{t}{(m1+m2)}] / [(c1+c2) * exp\frac{1}{(c1+c2)}]

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
diffrac said:
Hello,

Could someone please help me simplify the equation:

\frac{-1}{(c1+c2)} \cdot ln [(m1-m2)g-(c1+c2)v] = \frac{t}{(m1+m2)} - \frac{1}{(c1+c2)} \cdot ln[(m1-m2)g]

(where c1, c2, m1, m2, g, are constants)

so as to get: v = \frac{(m1-m2)g}{(c1+c2)} \cdot [ 1 - exp[\frac{-(c1+c2)t }{(m1+m2)}]] (teacher's solution)?


I tried several ways to solve the equation for v (applying e^ to it),
Was that the first thing you did? If so, that's not the best approach. The first thing to do would be to multiply both sides by -(c1 + c2).

In any case, show us what you did.
diffrac said:
but all i can seem to get is:

v = [exp\frac{t}{(m1+m2)}] / [(c1+c2) * exp\frac{1}{(c1+c2)}]

Thanks.
 
ok, well i applied e^ to the whole thing which gave me:

-(m1-m2)g + (c1+c2)v e^\frac{1}{c1+c2} = e^\frac{t}{m1+m2} -(m1-m2)g e^\frac{1}{c1+c2}.

I divided that by (m1-m2)g, and then 'simplified' that by eliminating the -e^(\frac{1}{c1+c2}) left on both sides of the equation.

that leaves me with:

e^\frac{1}{c1+c2} [(c1+c2)v] / (m1-m2)g = e^\frac{t}{m1+m2} / (m1-m2)g.

i then isolated the v on the left of the equation, and on the right simplified the (m1-m2)g, which finally gives me the result that i put on the first post...

ok so after i multiply both sides by -(c1+c2), i have to raise everything to e^ to get rid of the natural logarithms, right? thanks for your help
 
diffrac said:
ok, well i applied e^ to the whole thing which gave me:

-(m1-m2)g + (c1+c2)v e^\frac{1}{c1+c2} = e^\frac{t}{m1+m2} -(m1-m2)g e^\frac{1}{c1+c2}.
Your mistake is above. You are essentially saying that ea*b = ea * eb, which is not true.

I followed my own advice (by first multiplying both sides by -(c1 + c2) ) and got the teacher's solution.
diffrac said:
I divided that by (m1-m2)g, and then 'simplified' that by eliminating the -e^(\frac{1}{c1+c2}) left on both sides of the equation.

that leaves me with:

e^\frac{1}{c1+c2} [(c1+c2)v] / (m1-m2)g = e^\frac{t}{m1+m2} / (m1-m2)g.

i then isolated the v on the left of the equation, and on the right simplified the (m1-m2)g, which finally gives me the result that i put on the first post...

ok so after i multiply both sides by -(c1+c2), i have to raise everything to e^ to get rid of the natural logarithms, right? thanks for your help
 
Oh right...classic mistake. Although i did try it again and got the wrong answer.
Could i ask you to show me your steps to the result?
 
It's a lot of stuff to write with all the subscripts and exponents, so I'll only do a couple of steps.

Multiply both sides by -(c1 + c2):

ln[(m1 - m2)g - (c1 + c2)v] = -(c1 + c2)*t/(m1 + m2) + ln[(m1 - m2)g]

Exponentiate both sides (i.e. write each side as an exponent on e):

(m1 - m2)g = eln[(m1 - m2)g] - (c1 + c2)t/(m1 + m2)

I'm guessing that if you got this far you might have made a mistake in the next step, by saying that ea - b = ea - eb -- not true. If you made this mistake, take a few minutes and review the properties of exponents.
 
Hey great! I finally got it right this time.
It was one or two of those exponent rules that i tripped over, but i think i got it cleared up now.

So thank you so much for your help and details Mark44!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K