Help to understand a problem, integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fishingaxe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the area of a shaded region under a quadratic function, specifically the function defined as -0.75x² + 3. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the correct approach to determine the area between the function and a horizontal line at y = 5, as well as the implications of their initial calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods to calculate the area, including using integrals and considering the area of a rectangle. Some participants question the validity of the original poster's approach and suggest alternative methods for calculating the area under the curve.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to the problem, with some participants providing guidance on how to visualize the area and suggesting methods to calculate it. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify misunderstandings and refine the problem-solving process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly interpreting the integrals and the areas involved. There is mention of specific values and calculations that may have led to confusion, as well as the requirement to include constants in calculations as per the original poster's teacher's instructions.

Fishingaxe
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://imageshack.us/a/img197/305/yhmn.jpg

What I want to do is calculate the area of the colored space. As you can see in the picture the function is -0.75x^2+3 for the graph.

What I did is since the colored area reaches up to y5 and not y3 I took

2
∫(-0.75x^2+5)dx
0

-

2
∫(-0.75x^2+3)dx and then multiplied the answer by 2 to get the whole area
0
as both sides are identical. I realize now that it can't be the correct way to do it though as when I type in "-0.75x^2+5" in the graph calculator the line at the x-axis changes. I would greatly appreciate help on how to solve this.

OBS: This was a problem at a test I had a few days ago, can't imagining it going well. I won't know of the results yet but I'm just curious about this specific problem.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a "-" sign inbetween the integrals. It gets messed up when I try to write it next to each other
 
Fishingaxe said:
What I did is since the colored area reaches up to y5 and not y3 I took

2
∫(-0.75x^2+5)dx
0

-

2
∫(-0.75x^2+3)dx and then multiplied the answer by 2 to get the whole area
0
as both sides are identical. I realize now that it can't be the correct way to do it though as when I type in "-0.75x^2+5" in the graph calculator the line at the x-axis changes. I would greatly appreciate help on how to solve this.

OBS: This was a problem at a test I had a few days ago, can't imagining it going well. I won't know of the results yet but I'm just curious about this specific problem.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


That won't work, graph the function ##y = -\frac{3}{4}x^2+5## to see why.

Try extending the shaded area to create a rectangle. Can you figure out a way to use this new area (which is easily calculated) and the integral of the function to calculate the original shaded area?
 
Ye, I know it didnt work :s I don't know how to calculate the new area if I just color in the rest of the rectangle.

I would know how to calculate the function's area i.e the part I would color in, but the part that is already colored I don't know :s.
 
Fishingaxe said:
Ye, I know it didnt work :s I don't know how to calculate the new area if I just color in the rest of the rectangle.

I would know how to calculate the function's area i.e the part I would color in, but the part that is already colored I don't know :s.

Okay, think about it this way.

A = The shaded area you are trying to find
B = Area under the function and above the x-axis
C = Area of the rectangle

? + ? = ?
A = ?
 
A = C-B?

What I don't know is how to find the area of the rectangle. I know this is supposed to be super easy as it was one of the easier problems on the exam I had.
 
That's correct for A! Area of a rectangle is just length times width. You don't need to do any fancy integrating (although you could if you wanted to).
 
Seriously? The area of a rectangle is "width times height". From your graph it looks like the height is 5 and the width is 4.

You could also think of the upper limit of that rectangle as "y= 5" so the area of the rectangle is \int_{-2}^2 5 dx.

The distance from the parabola up to that line is 5- (-0.75x^2+ 3)= 2+ 0.75x^2 so the area between the line and the parabola is the integral of that.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You could also think of the upper limit of that rectangle as "y= 5" so the area of the rectangle is \int_{-2}^2 5 dx.

The integral ∫02(-0.75x^2+3dx) [0.75x^3/3+3x+c]20

= -0.75*2^3/3+3*2+c - (0+c) = 4 +c-c = 4ae(area units) that is the area of the function (or half the function right? since it is x0->x2 and not x-2->x2)

Then what I did was, just same thing, calculating he half of the rectangle. So:

20(-0.75x^2+5)dx [-0.75x^3+5x+c]20

= -0.75*2^3/3+5*2+c - (0+c) = 8+c-c = 8 ae. Then I took 8ae-4ae (half rectangle - half of the function area) which is 4ae, then I multiplied it by 2 and got 8ae for the entire colored space.



But I think I just should've skipped the -0.75x^2 part huh. I get it now, damnit. Ye makes a lot of sense lol, I must be the stupidest person alive loooooooooooooooooooooool, the most obvious things are the hardest for me to see.
 
  • #10
Fishingaxe said:
The integral ∫02(-0.75x^2+3dx) [0.75x^3/3+3x+c]20

= -0.75*2^3/3+3*2+c - (0+c) = 4 +c-c = 4ae(area units) that is the area of the function (or half the function right? since it is x0->x2 and not x-2->x2)

Then what I did was, just same thing, calculating he half of the rectangle. So:

20(-0.75x^2+5)dx [-0.75x^3+5x+c]20

= -0.75*2^3/3+5*2+c - (0+c) = 8+c-c = 8 ae. Then I took 8ae-4ae (half rectangle - half of the function area) which is 4ae, then I multiplied it by 2 and got 8ae for the entire colored space.
But I think I just should've skipped the -0.75x^2 part huh. I get it now, damnit. Ye makes a lot of sense lol, I must be the stupidest person alive loooooooooooooooooooooool, the most obvious things are the hardest for me to see.

Okay, your notation is getting a little sloppy. First of all, you don't need "ae" for area units. The integral computes an exact number. The ae just makes the computations more complicated because they can be confused for variables if variables are present in your integral. Tack on the units, if needed, at the end of the problem. Second of all, when computing definite integrals, you can drop the integrating constant because it cancels out. You still get the correct answer if you include it, but there is no point in doing so.

I assume you meant to say ∫02(-0.75x^2+3dx) = [0.75x^3/3+3x+c]20. The computations would have been easier if you converted 0.75 to ##\frac{3}{4}## because ##\int (\frac{3}{4}x^2 + 3) dx = \frac{1}{4}x^3 + 3x + C##. Now you don't have to worry about multiplying 0.75 by 8 and divinding by 3.

In any case, were you trying my approach or HallsofIvy's approach? The second integral is wrong for calculating the area of the rectangle. The correct integral would be ##\displaystyle\int_{-2}^2 5 dx##, as HoI noted, which equals 20. 20 minus your answer of 8 from the first integral yields the correct answer of 12.

Doing it HallsofIvy's way yields ##\displaystyle\int_{-2}^2 (2 + \frac{3}{4}x^2) dx = [2x+\frac{1}{4}x^3]_{x = -2}^{x = 2}##
 
  • #11
The reason I use "ae" is because my teacher told me to always include it in my calculations.

Ye, I realized it was wrong as noted, the second integral that is. I should've left out -3/4x^2 in that one to get the correct answer.

Also I know C cancels each other out but my teacher told me always to use it in my calculations also.

But yeah, this was a rly easy problem once I understood what I was doing wrong lol.
 
  • #12
Yes, so there are several different ways you can do this:
1) The area of the 4 by 5 rectangle is 4(5)= 20 and the area under the parabola is \int_{-2}^2 -(3/4)x^2+ 3 dx= \left[-(1/4)x^3+ 3x\right]_{-2}^2= (-(1/4)(8)+ 3(2))- (-(1/4)(-8)+ 3(-2))= (4)- (-4)= 8. So the area between them is 20- 8= 12.

2) The area of the rectangle is \int_{-2}^2 5 dx= \right[5x\left]_{-2}^2= 5(2)- 5(-2)= 10+ 10= 20. The area of the parabola is as before so the area between them is 20- 8= 12.<br /> <br /> 3) The distance between the line, y= 5, and the parabola, y= -(3/4)x^2+ 3, is 5- (-(3/4)x^2+ 3)= 2+ (3/4)x^2 so the area between them is \int_{-2}^2 2+ (3/4)x^2 dx= \left[2x+ (1/4)x^3\right]_{-2}^2= (2(2)+ (1/4)(8))- (2(-2)+ (1/4)(-8))= (4+ 2)- (-4- 2)= 6- (-6)= 12.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Of course, we &lt;b&gt;could&lt;/b&gt; have recognized that the graphs are symmetric about the y-axis so just done 0 to 2 and doubled that result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K