Help Understanding a Quantum Circuit Identity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding a quantum circuit identity for converting a controlled U gate into a series of CNOT gates and single qubit gates. Participants explore the conceptual framework behind the identity, the definition of the unitary matrix A, and its application in practical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the conceptual understanding of the identity $$ U= AXA^{\dagger}X $$ and how to define the matrix A.
  • Others suggest that the purpose of using CNOT gates and single qubit operations is to simplify implementation in experiments, despite requiring more operations than a single controlled U gate.
  • There is a question regarding whether A must also be a 4x4 unitary matrix, given that U is a 4x4 matrix, with some participants noting that U and A must share dimensions.
  • One participant expresses understanding of the concept but struggles with applying it, specifically in determining the appropriate unitary matrix A for a given controlled U represented by a specific matrix.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the basis used for the matrix representation and the specific unitary operation intended for the second qubit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the application of the circuit identity and the definition of matrix A. There is no consensus on the specific unitary matrix that fits into the equation for A, indicating ongoing uncertainty and exploration.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a conclusion on the exact nature of the unitary matrix A or its application in specific scenarios, highlighting potential limitations in their understanding of the identity's implications.

CMJ96
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hello I have the following quantum circuit identity for converting a controlled U gate (4x4 matrix) into a series of CNOT gates and single qubit gates
$$ U= AXA^{\dagger}X$$
where A is a unitary matrix.
Here is a picture of the mentioned identity.
hCYpzW8.png

Can someone help me understand conceptually what is going on here? How do you actually define A?
 

Attachments

  • hCYpzW8.png
    hCYpzW8.png
    6.5 KB · Views: 1,054
Physics news on Phys.org
CMJ96 said:
Can someone help me understand conceptually what is going on here?
The idea is to use a CNOT gate and single qubit operations instead of trying to implement the controlled U. Single qubit operations are simpler to do in real experiments, so that the focus is to implement a CNOT gate and try to use it as much as possible. As you see, the price to pay is that you have to perform two CNOTs and two single-qubit operations instead of a single operation.

CMJ96 said:
How do you actually define A?
Depends on what you want U to achieve. The idea is to find the A that allows you to end up in the same state as with the controlled U gate.
 
So when A is introduced, would it be another 4x4 unitary matrix (assuming the control U gate is a 4x4 matrix)?
 
CMJ96 said:
So when A is introduced, would it be another 4x4 unitary matrix (assuming the control U gate is a 4x4 matrix)?
From ##U= AXA^{\dagger}X##, you see that ##U## and ##A## have the same dimension. You can look at the action of ##U## and ##A## on the lower qubit only, in which case they are 2x2 matrices, but if you want the full controlled gate, which has to be a two-qubit operator, then you have to write them as a 4x4 matrices.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CMJ96
Hi I've gone away and had a think about this, and now I feel I understand what is happening pretty well, however I'm still struggling with applying it.
$$
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} & \frac{-1}{2} \\
0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}
\end{bmatrix}
$$
Is it appropriate to be using the aforementioned circuit identity to write this controlled U as single qubit gates and CNOT's? I have been trying for a while now to figure out what unitary matrix fits into the equation for A and can't quite get it
 
Last edited:
CMJ96 said:
Hi I've gone away and had a think about this, and now I feel I understand what is happening pretty well, however I'm still struggling with applying it.
$$
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} & \frac{-1}{2} \\
0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}
\end{bmatrix}
$$
What basis are you using for the matrix representation? What matrix is that supposed to be? What is the U you are trying to apply to the second qubit?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K