Help understanding statically determinate/indeterminate structures

  • Thread starter Thread starter steve321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structures
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding statically determinate and indeterminate structures in the context of structural engineering. Participants are exploring the criteria for determining the statical nature of structures, particularly focusing on reaction forces and connection types.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants share their methods for identifying statically determinate structures, including the use of reaction forces and the number of structural members. Questions arise regarding the definitions and practical implications of determinate structures, as well as the differences between various connection types such as pins, rollers, and fixed supports.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confusion about the underlying principles and seek clarification on the concepts of determinate structures and the significance of different connection types. There is a request for resources that could provide a clearer understanding of these topics.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the use of shortcuts and memory aids for determining statical properties, indicating a reliance on informal methods rather than a complete understanding of the theoretical foundations. There is also a recognition of the potential complexity involved in the application of these concepts in practical scenarios.

steve321
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
hi!

i have a bunch of questions where I'm suppose to indicate if a structure is statically determinate

i have way to do this that usually gives me a decent answer. i go with r > 3n means it's indeterminate, and r = 3n means it's determinate. r represents reaction forces, and n represents the # of parts in the structure member.

just by memory i have an idea of how many 'reaction forces' there are. if there's a pin (the little triangle), i stick in two forces. if it's a roller (the little wheel thingy) i pop in one, and if the bar appears to be fixed to a wall i stick in three forces. if there's a hinge you draw four arrows but only count two of them. (or at least this is what the book seems to do)

then, the number of 'bars' in the drawing represents the number of structures, although if the structure has a bunch of connecting horizontal members you seem to split those into two for some reason.

anyway as you can see i have all these little shortcuts that help me get the right answer, but i don't know what exactly I'm doing.

first, what exactly is a determinate structure? i know it's something that doesn't have any more supports than it needs, and has few reaction forces (enough to solve).. but what does this mean? how does this translate into any practical application? is a determinate structure stiffer? more stable? easier to _____? i don't understand why i need to know this magical, intangible property of a structure.

second, i don't really understand the connection types. the pin and the fixed bar both seem to be the same thing from what i can tell, and i have absolutely no idea what the 'roller' represents in real life, nor do i understand what the triangle on the little circles represents. likewise i don't understand 'internal hinge' from 'pinned truss node', those both look the same.

if anyone could point me in the direction of an article that explains this clearly, or summarizes what exactly I'm doing, that would be a huge help. i hate doing things without understanding them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
steve321 said:
hi!

i have a bunch of questions where I'm suppose to indicate if a structure is statically determinate

i have way to do this that usually gives me a decent answer. i go with r > 3n means it's indeterminate, and r = 3n means it's determinate. r represents reaction forces, and n represents the # of parts in the structure member.
Although there are handy dandy formulas for indeterminacy in trusses, I'd stay away from them unless you were sure of the correct formula for determining same.
just by memory i have an idea of how many 'reaction forces' there are. if there's a pin (the little triangle), i stick in two forces.
Yes, in 2D , a vertical force and a horizontal force
if it's a roller (the little wheel thingy) i pop in one,
yes, perendicular to the roller support
and if the bar appears to be fixed to a wall i stick in three forces.
that should be 2 forces and a moment (couple)
if there's a hinge you draw four arrows but only count two of them. (or at least this is what the book seems to do)
hinge and pin can be treated as the same
then, the number of 'bars' in the drawing represents the number of structures, although if the structure has a bunch of connecting horizontal members you seem to split those into two for some reason.
I think your talking members in trusses..you can look up the rules for determinancy at the risk of confusuion
anyway as you can see i have all these little shortcuts that help me get the right answer, but i don't know what exactly I'm doing.

first, what exactly is a determinate structure? i know it's something that doesn't have any more supports than it needs, and has few reaction forces (enough to solve).. but what does this mean?
A determinate structure is one in which the forces and moments in the members can be solved by using the standard 3 equilibrium equations (sum of forces in x direction, sum of forces in y direction, and sum of moments about any point all equal 0.
.. how does this translate into any practical application? is a determinate structure stiffer? more stable? easier to _____? i don't understand why i need to know this magical, intangible property of a structure.
it is not magical...by adding supports or members, you do make the structure stronger and stiffer by reducing stresses and deflections, but often at a cost. A member that is fixed at both ends can take more load than a member that is pinned at both ends, but the costs of 'fixing' the end connections (by welding or plating and bolting the connection , for example) may negate the savings, or be impractical.
Also, the use of indeterminate structures (multiple reaction points) may not be good when designing for extremely low deflection tolerances.
second, i don't really understand the connection types. the pin and the fixed bar both seem to be the same thing from what i can tell,
no, the pin can handle 2 perpendicular forces (cannot translate but is free to rotate and thus incapable of supporting a moment), the fixed support can handle 2 forces and a moment (couple), unable to translate or rotate in the ideal case
and i have absolutely no idea what the 'roller' represents in real life,
free to rotate and free to translate in the sliding direction
nor do i understand what the triangle on the little circles represents
. this is a roller support, it can't move in one direction but it can move (slide or roll) in the other direction , as a skateboard does...you might want to consider the roller support as a skateboard attached to the member
likewise i don't understand 'internal hinge' from 'pinned truss node', those both look the same.
yes, they do...
if anyone could point me in the direction of an article that explains this clearly, or summarizes what exactly I'm doing, that would be a huge help. i hate doing things without understanding them.
google??
 
thank you! this is a huge help!
 
oh, and can you give me a real life example of the roller, and the pin on the roller? i can't think of any structures that sit on ball bearings or skateboards.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K