help whit problem of college admission exam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the correct application of Newton's second law, represented as ΣF = ma, in the context of an elevator scenario involving a spring and a hanging mass. Participants clarify that the forces acting on the mass include the upward elastic force and the downward gravitational force, and emphasize the importance of proper notation to avoid confusion, particularly regarding acceleration signs. A solution for the elongation of the spring is derived, with a calculated value of 11.01 cm, though concerns are raised about the accuracy of significant figures and local gravitational variations. The conversation also questions the assumption that the acceleration of the elevator and the mass are equal, suggesting that additional context is necessary for a complete understanding of the problem. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of applying physics principles in real-world scenarios.
Camilo08642
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
If we hang an 11 kg object from the ceiling of an elevator using a spring with a spring constant of 650 N/m, what will be the elongation of the spring in centimeters when the elevator is moving upward while decelerating at a rate of 3.3 m/s²
Relevant Equations
Σf=m*a
Fe= Δx*k
w= G*m
Σf=m*a
Fe-w=m*-a is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Camilo08642 said:
Σf=m*a
Fe-w=m*-a is this correct?
Certainly, ##\sum F = ma##

Next, on the left hand side you are expressing the sum of the forces as the supporting force from the elevator ##F_e## directed upward (positive) and the weight ##w## of the object directed downward (negative).

So far, so good.

On the right hand side you are expressing ##m \times a## as ##m \times -a##. That is rather unfortunate notation. You would have us believe that ##ma = -ma##.

How about: ##F_e - w = ma## along with ##a=-3.3 \ \text{m}/\text{s}^2##

Can you solve for ##F_e##?
 
  • Like
Likes Albertus Magnus and TSny
jbriggs444 said:
How about: ##F_e - w = ma## along with ##a=-3.3 \ \text{m}/\text{s}^2##
I think that one needs to be careful here with the vectors. Assuming the convention "up" is positive, "down "is negative,
  1. Gravity is down: ##~\mathbf F_g=mg~(-\mathbf{\hat y})##.
  2. We are told that the spring is elongated, so the elastic force is "up": ##~\mathbf F_e=F_e~(+\mathbf{\hat y})##.
  3. We are told that the elevator is moving up with decreasing speed so its acceleration is down. What about the acceleration of the mass hanging from the spring? If we match its acceleration with that of the elevator and write ##~m\mathbf a=ma~(-\mathbf{\hat y})##.
Putting this together gives $$\begin{align} & \mathbf F_e+\mathbf F_g=m\mathbf a \nonumber \\ & F_e~(+\mathbf{\hat y})+mg~(-\mathbf{\hat y})=ma~(-\mathbf{\hat y})\nonumber \\
& F_e-mg=-ma. \nonumber
\end{align}$$ Note that the last equation can be used to find the elongation of the spring when the acceleration of the mass matches that of the elevator.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Albertus Magnus, Lnewqban and Chestermiller
jbriggs444 said:
Certainly, ##\sum F = ma##

Next, on the left hand side you are expressing the sum of the forces as the supporting force from the elevator ##F_e## directed upward (positive) and the weight ##w## of the object directed downward (negative).

So far, so good.

On the right hand side you are expressing ##m \times a## as ##m \times -a##. That is rather unfortunate notation. You would have us believe that ##ma = -ma##.

How about: ##F_e - w = ma## along with ##a=-3.3 \ \text{m}/\text{s}^2##

Can you solve for ##F_e##?
thanks for the answer then the answer would be Δx= (M*(G-a))/k= 11.01 cm
 
Camilo08642 said:
thanks for the answer then the answer would be Δx= (M*(G-a))/k= 11.01 cm
The answer seems correct. Though it has too many significant figures. How accurately do you know ##M##, ##k##, ##a## and local ##g##?

It appears that you have used ##g## = 9.80665 m/sec2. However, local ##g## will vary significantly from that standard figure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_of_Earth said:
Gravity on the Earth's surface varies by around 0.7%, from 9.7639 m/s2 on the Nevado Huascarán mountain in Peru to 9.8337 m/s2 at the surface of the Arctic Ocean.[6] In large cities, it ranges from 9.7806 m/s2 [7] in Kuala Lumpur, Mexico City, and Singapore to 9.825 m/s2 in Oslo and Helsinki.
 
Last edited:
I am troubled by the proposed solution of this problem. We are told that
  • the spring is elongated
  • the elevator is moving up with some undefined velocity ##v##
  • the acceleration of the elevator, not the mass, is 3.3 m/s2 down
So far, so good. What is the justification for equating the acceleration of the elevator with the acceleration of the mass? That would be appropriate if the mass were rigidly attached to the elevator but is not the case here.

Let's consider a plausible scenario that fulfills all of the above pieces of information and see where it leads us. We have an elevator that moves initially at constant velocity ##v## up. The hanging mass is at equilibrium and the elongation of the spring from its relaxed length is ##y_0=\dfrac{mg}{k}.~## At ##t=0## the elevator starts decelerating at 3.3 m/s2 as it nears its destination. At that time the mass will start simple harmonic motion. Its displacement from the equilibrium position, subject to the initial conditions, will be $$y(t)=\frac{v}{\omega}\sin(\omega t)~~~~\left(\omega=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\right).$$ Thus, at ##t=0## the elongation of the spring is $$\Delta L=\frac{mg}{k}= \frac{(11\times 9.8)~\text{N}}{650~\text{N/m}}=16.6~\text{cm}.$$ This answer follows from and is consistent with what is given. If this answer is not what the author of the problem intended, then additional information should have been provided.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Albertus Magnus, jbriggs444, Lnewqban and 1 other person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top