Help with an Atwood's Machine problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter jcranford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem related to an ideal Atwood's machine, where N washers are moved from one side to another, causing a descent of 47.1 cm in 0.40 seconds. Participants express confusion about applying the relevant equations, particularly regarding acceleration and mass calculations. Initial attempts to derive acceleration from the given distance and time yield a value of 2.94 m/s², but doubts remain about the methodology. Hints provided emphasize the use of kinematic equations and the implications of an ideal machine, such as frictionless conditions. The conversation highlights the need for a clearer algebraic approach to solve for the masses after transferring the washers.
jcranford
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the ideal Atwood's machine in Figure 4-65. When N washers are transferred from the left side to the right side, the right side descends 47.1cm in 0.40s. Find N.

Homework Equations



a = (m2-m1/m1+m2)g

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm honestly not sure where to start with this one. We did one Atwood example in class and it wasn't anything like this. I'm not sure if that equation is relevant either, it's just the one that was given when we did the example in class.

The first thing I did was convert the given distance and time into an acceleration of m/s2, so I converted the 47.1cm -> .471m / .4s and got 1.17m/s, then divided by .4s again to get 2.94m/s2, which I'm not sure if that's the right way to do that or not. I think I have to solve for the masses, but I'm just really lost without a clue on this one. A push in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.Also, if anyone wants to take a look at this one while they're at it. This is what I've done so far.

For (a), I basically found the max force of static friction and said that was the most horizontal force it could have exerted on it for the top block not to slip. (b), I used the net force it gave me to calculate m(a) for 1.5m/s2 and then calculated the force of friction by subtracting the net force of the smaller block from static friction for the smaller block. I'm not really sure that's a legal maneuver. I'm just lost on (c). At first I just used the new force to calculate an acceleration, but then I realized they would have two different accelerations due to this force being greater than the max static friction force. It's probably because it's late but I'm just blanking on what I'm supposed to do next. Any suggestions would be great. Thank you all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm honestly not sure where to start with this one ... I converted the 47.1cm -> .471m / .4s and got 1.17m/s, then divided by .4s again to get 2.94m/s2, which I'm not sure if that's the right way to do that or not
Hint: kinematic equations. You have the distance and the time, and you know it is constant acceleration.
Note:
- if the machine is ideal - what does that say about the friction?
- the initial condition (in the reference figure) has 5 washers on each side for ##m_1=m_2=5m##- what would the acceleration be in this situation?
- can you write an expression for ##m_1## and ##m_2## after ##N## washers have been moved from one side to the other?
 
Simon Bridge said:
Hint: kinematic equations. You have the distance and the time, and you know it is constant acceleration.
Note:
- if the machine is ideal - what does that say about the friction?
- the initial condition (in the reference figure) has 5 washers on each side for ##m_1=m_2=5m##- what would the acceleration be in this situation?
- can you write an expression for ##m_1## and ##m_2## after ##N## washers have been moved from one side to the other?

Ideal would mean frictionless, correct? Also, that the cables have no mass.

In the initial condition, acceleration would be zero. (5-5)9.8 / (5+5) would be 0/10 and therefore zero. I kind of figured out that with a = 2.94, m1 must equal 3.5 and m2 must equal 6.5. This balances out the equation for acceleration, however I have no method by which I did this. I basically plugged in some numbers and went with it when it added up. I'd love to know what it looks like to solve for this algebraically and how to go about it. I think that's what you're getting at in your third point, but I don't think I'm getting it.
 
That's good so far - however, I cannot help you f you don't follow the hints (you only addressed two of them):
Simon Bridge said:
Hint: kinematic equations. You have the distance and the time, and you know it is constant acceleration.
Note:
- can you write an expression for ##m_1## and ##m_2## after ##N## washers have been moved from one side to the other?
... presumably an ideal machine would have a zero-mass pulley too.
 
Last edited:
2nd. Question.
a.) F=(M+m)a
ma=mgμs

b) F/2=(M+m)a.

c) (1.) 2F-mgμk=MaM
(2.) mam=mgμk
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K