Help with Canonical Poisson Brackets & EM Field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of canonical Poisson brackets in the context of a particle moving in an electromagnetic field, specifically using the Lagrangian $$\mathcal{L}=\dfrac{m}{2}(\dot{x}^2_1+\dot{x}^2_2+\dot{x}^2_3)-q\varphi+\dfrac{q}{c}\vec{A}\cdot\dot{\vec{x}}$$ and the vector potential $$\vec{A}=\frac{B}{2}(x_1\hat{u}_2-x_2\hat{u}_1)$$ for a constant magnetic field. The canonical momenta are defined as $$p_1=m\dot{x}_1-\dfrac{qB}{2c}x_2$$ and $$p_2=m\dot{x}_2+\dfrac{qB}{2c}x_1$$, leading to the conclusion that the Poisson brackets $$\left\{p_i,p_j\right\}=0$$ hold by definition, despite initial confusion regarding their derivation. The Hamiltonian is derived as $$H=\frac{1}{2m} (\vec{p}-q/c \vec{A})^2+q \varphi$$, confirming the distinction between canonical and mechanical momenta.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and Hamiltonian dynamics.
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory, particularly vector potentials and magnetic fields.
  • Knowledge of canonical Poisson brackets and their definitions.
  • Basic proficiency in calculus, especially partial derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Lagrangian for charged particles in electromagnetic fields.
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of canonical Poisson brackets in classical mechanics.
  • Learn about the relationship between canonical and mechanical momenta in Hamiltonian mechanics.
  • Investigate the Zeeman effect and its connection to electromagnetic fields and particle dynamics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in classical mechanics, electromagnetism, and advanced dynamics,

Matthew_
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
We were introduced the lagrangian for a particle moving in an eletromagnetic field (for context, this was a brief introduction before dealing with Zeeman effect) as $$\mathcal{L}=\dfrac{m}{2}(\dot{x}^2_1+\dot{x}^2_2+\dot{x}^2_3)-q\varphi+\dfrac{q}{c}\vec{A}\cdot\dot{\vec{x}}.$$ A "velocity-dependent generalized potential" appears. For a constant magnetic field oriented along the ##x_3## axis:$$\vec{A}=\frac{B}{2}(x_1\hat{u}_2-x_2\hat{u}_1).$$
Now, the conjugated momenta of the generalized coordinates are: $$p_1=m\dot{x}_1-\dfrac{qB}{2c}x_2,$$ $$p_2=m\dot{x}_2+\dfrac{qB}{2c}x_1,$$ $$p_3=m\dot{x}_3.$$
It was claimed that canonical poisson brackets hold, namely ##\left\{p_i,p_j\right\}=0##. I have no idea why this is the case tho, since the derivation of the lagrangian with respect of the generalized velocities gives a clear dependence between the coordinates and the adjoint momenta. Evaluating ##\left\{p_1,p_2\right\}## I think I should get something like (summation over j is omitted): $$\left\{p_1,p_2\right\}=\frac{\partial p_1}{\partial x_j}\frac{\partial p_2}{\partial p_j}-\frac{\partial p_1}{\partial p_j}\frac{\partial p_2}{\partial x_j}=\frac{\partial p_1}{\partial x_2}-\frac{\partial p_2}{\partial x_1}=-\frac{qB}{c}\neq 0.$$ Is there some reason why this does not work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The canonical Poisson brackets hold by definition, because for phase-space functions ##A## and ##B## by definition
$$\{A,B \}=\frac{\partial A}{\partial q_j} \frac{\partial B}{\partial p_j} - \frac{\partial B}{\partial q_j} \frac{\partial A}{\partial p_j}.$$
To calculate Poisson brackets you have to express all quantities with the ##q_j## and ##p_j## as independent variables, i.e., you have to eliminate the ##\dot{q}_j## using the ##p_j## and ##q_j## first. So it's the other way, i.e., now the Poisson brackets between the velocities are non-zero now. You have
$$\dot{\vec{x}}=\frac{1}{m}(\vec{p}-q \vec{A}/c),$$
i.e.,
$$[\dot{x}_j,\dot{x}_k]=\frac{1}{m^2} \left [-\frac{q}{c} \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i} \delta_{ki} +\delta_{ij} \frac{q}{c} \frac{\partial A_k}{\partial x_i} \right] = \frac{q}{mc} \left (\frac{\partial A_k}{\partial x_j}-\frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i} \right) = \frac{q}{mc} \epsilon_{jki} B_i,$$
where I've used that ##\vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}##.

The Hamiltonian formulation is derived by first calculating the Hamiltonian as a function of the coordinates and canonical momenta,
$$H=\vec{x} \cdot \vec{p}-L=\frac{m}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2+q \varphi=\frac{1}{2m} (\vec{p}-q/c \vec{A})^2+q \varphi.$$
Then the equations of motion are the Hamilton canonical equations,
$$\dot{\vec{x}}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial \vec{p}} = \{\vec{x},H \}, \quad \dot{\vec{p}}=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial \vec{x}}=\{\vec{p},H \}.$$
Note that the canonical momenta ##\vec{p}## are not the mechanical momenta, ##\vec{\pi}=m \dot{\vec{x}}=\vec{p}-q \vec{A}/c##.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn and Matthew_
vanhees71 said:
The canonical Poisson brackets hold by definition, because for phase-space functions ##A## and ##B## by definition
$$\{A,B \}=\frac{\partial A}{\partial q_j} \frac{\partial B}{\partial p_j} - \frac{\partial B}{\partial q_j} \frac{\partial A}{\partial p_j}.$$
To calculate Poisson brackets you have to express all quantities with the ##q_j## and ##p_j## as independent variables, i.e., you have to eliminate the ##\dot{q}_j## using the ##p_j## and ##q_j## first. So it's the other way, i.e., now the Poisson brackets between the velocities are non-zero now. You have
$$\dot{\vec{x}}=\frac{1}{m}(\vec{p}-q \vec{A}/c),$$
i.e.,
$$[\dot{x}_j,\dot{x}_k]=\frac{1}{m^2} \left [-\frac{q}{c} \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i} \delta_{ki} +\delta_{ij} \frac{q}{c} \frac{\partial A_k}{\partial x_i} \right] = \frac{q}{mc} \left (\frac{\partial A_k}{\partial x_j}-\frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i} \right) = \frac{q}{mc} \epsilon_{jki} B_i,$$
where I've used that ##\vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}##.

The Hamiltonian formulation is derived by first calculating the Hamiltonian as a function of the coordinates and canonical momenta,
$$H=\vec{x} \cdot \vec{p}-L=\frac{m}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2+q \varphi=\frac{1}{2m} (\vec{p}-q/c \vec{A})^2+q \varphi.$$
Then the equations of motion are the Hamilton canonical equations,
$$\dot{\vec{x}}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial \vec{p}} = \{\vec{x},H \}, \quad \dot{\vec{p}}=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial \vec{x}}=\{\vec{p},H \}.$$
Note that the canonical momenta ##\vec{p}## are not the mechanical momenta, ##\vec{\pi}=m \dot{\vec{x}}=\vec{p}-q \vec{A}/c##.
Thank you, this was illuminating
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
610
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K