Chemistry Help with Complex Acid-Base Titration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities of calculating concentrations in a titration involving citric acid and a base, highlighting confusion over the application of the formula C1V1=C2V2 due to a 3:1 molar ratio. The user questions whether the stoichiometric ratio should be incorporated into the equation, particularly since the volume of the base (C2) is unknown. There is a suggestion to abandon the C1V1=C2V2 formula in favor of a more straightforward approach using stoichiometry and moles for clarity. The conversation emphasizes the potential pitfalls of relying on shortcuts without understanding the underlying principles. Ultimately, a deeper grasp of stoichiometry is recommended for accurate titration calculations.
kofffie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Help! I am confused with my assignment. it was about complex acid base titration. the analyte was citric acid and the titrant was a base. To find it, I need to search for C1V1=C2V2, however during the balanced equation, there is 3 mol of my base that will be reacting to 1 acid. Will the ratio of mol be included in the C1V1=C2V2 equation.? Lets say that C1 is the acid and C2 is the base. What will the equation now? the volume of C2 is missing
Relevant Equations
C1V1=C2V2
Help! I am confused with my assignment. it was about complex acid base titration. the analyte was citric acid and the titrant was a base. To find it, I need to search for C1V1=C2V2, however during the balanced equation, there is 3 mol of my base that will be reacting to 1 acid. Will the ratio of mol be included in the C1V1=C2V2 equation.? Let's say that C1 is the acid and C2 is the base. What will the equation now? the volume of C2 is missing
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Forget about C1V1=C2V2, just go for stoichiometry and moles.

Compare with http://www.titrations.info/titration-calculation

The idea of using C1V1=C2V2 to facilitate calculations does IMHO more harm than good to students - they never remember the logic behind, they think the shortcut is the right thing.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top