I Help with Derivation of Linearized Einstein Field Eqns

epovo
Messages
114
Reaction score
21
Hi all -
I am trying to follow a derivation of the above. At some point I need to find gαβ for
gαβ = ηαβ + hαβ
with |hαβ|<<1
I am stuck. The text says
gαβ = ηαβ - hαβ
but I cannot figure out why. Can anybody help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you want both expressions to be each-other inverses, up to linear order in the metric perturbation h. So what do you get?
 
Take ##g_{\alpha\beta}=\eta_{\alpha\beta}+h_{\alpha\beta}## and ##g^{\alpha\beta}=\eta^{\alpha\beta}-h^{\alpha\beta}## and multiply them together and what do you get?
 
I get an identity as long as ##h_{\alpha\beta} h^{\alpha\beta}## is <<1
 
Voila!. The quadratic term is discarded. Depending on the source, ##h_{\alpha\beta}## is called the Pauli-Fierz field. It was discovered by Pauli and Fierz as far back as 1939 that the only Lagrange action (hence field equations) describing a spin 2 field is necessarily the linearized Hilbert-Einstein action.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Thank you guys!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top