Understanding L'Hôpital's rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kolika28
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    L'hopital's rule
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on understanding L'Hôpital's rule, specifically the application of limits and derivatives in calculus. The participants clarify that for functions f and g, where f(a) = g(a) = 0 and g'(a) ≠ 0, the expression f'(a)/g'(a) equals lim(x→a) f(x)/g(x). They emphasize the importance of justifying the transition from the quotient of limits to the limit of a quotient, which is valid when the limits exist and the denominator is non-zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of derivatives and the definition of differentiability
  • Familiarity with L'Hôpital's rule and its conditions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of limits and functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal proof of L'Hôpital's rule
  • Explore examples of applying L'Hôpital's rule to indeterminate forms
  • Learn about continuity and its role in limits
  • Investigate the implications of differentiability on limit behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of limits and derivatives in the context of L'Hôpital's rule.

Kolika28
Messages
146
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
Let f and g be derivable functions and let a be a real number such that

##f(a)=g(a)=0 ##
##g'(a) ≠ 0 ##

Justify that
##\frac{f'(a)}{g'(a)} ## = ##\lim_{x\to a}\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}##

You may only use the definition of the derivative and boundary rules.
Relevant Equations
##\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}##
My attempt:
##\frac{f'(a)}{g'(a)} ## =
##\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(a+h)-f(a)}{h}\cdot\frac{h}{g(a+h)-g(a)}##
= ##\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(a+h)-f(a)}{g(a+h)-g(a)}##

I don't think I am doing this right. I don't even understand how I am supposed to use the boundary rules. I really appreciate some help!
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Kolika28 said:
Homework Statement: Let f and g be derivable functions and let a be a real number such that
In English we say "differentiable" not "derivable."
Kolika28 said:
##f(a)=g(a)=0 ##
##g'(a) ≠ 0 ##

Justify that
##\frac{f'(a)}{g'(a)} ## = ##\lim_{x\to a}\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}##

You may only use the definition of the derivative and boundary rules.
Homework Equations: ##\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}##

My attempt:
##\frac{f'(a)}{g'(a)} ## =
##\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(a+h)-f(a)}{h}\cdot\frac{h}{g(a+h)-g(a)}##
No, this (above) isn't correct.
##\frac{f'(a)}{g'(a)} ##
##= \frac{\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(a+h)-f(a)}{h}}{\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{g(a+h)-g(a)}{h}}##
You would need to justify turning this quotient of limits into the limit of a quotient (or the limit of the product you wrote.)

As a hint, you know that the limit in the denominator exists, right? You also know the values of f(a) and g(a).
Kolika28 said:
= ##\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(a+h)-f(a)}{g(a+h)-g(a)}##

I don't think I am doing this right. I don't even understand how I am supposed to use the boundary rules. I really appreciate some help!
 
Mark44 said:
In English we say "differentiable" not "derivable."
No, this (above) isn't correct.
##\frac{f'(a)}{g'(a)} ##
##= \frac{\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(a+h)-f(a)}{h}}{\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{g(a+h)-g(a)}{h}}##
You would need to justify turning this quotient of limits into the limit of a quotient (or the limit of the product you wrote.)

As a hint, you know that the limit in the denominator exists, right? You also know the values of f(a) and g(a).

Hmm, I'm sorry, but I takes some time for me to understand. So I can't write the limit as a product of those two fractions to get rid of the h? I know that the limit in the denominator exist and the values of f(a) and g(a) is equal to zero, but I don't see how I am supposed to use those facts to get to the term

##\lim_{x\to a}\frac{f(x)}{g(x)} ##
 
Kolika28 said:
Hmm, I'm sorry, but I takes some time for me to understand. So I can't write the limit as a product of those two fractions to get rid of the h?
Under what conditions is it true that ##\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \frac{\lim_{x \to a}f(x)}{\lim_{x \to a}g(x)}##? You seemed to gloss over this by assuming that it's always true.
Kolika28 said:
I know that the limit in the denominator exist and the values of f(a) and g(a) is equal to zero, but I don't see how I am supposed to use those facts to get to the term

##\lim_{x\to a}\frac{f(x)}{g(x)} ##
##\lim_{x \to a} F(x)## is the same as ##\lim_{h \to 0} F(a + h)##, right? You can change to a different variable for the limit.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Mark44 said:
Under what conditions is it true that limx→af(x)g(x)=limx→af(x)limx→ag(x)limx→af(x)g(x)=limx→af(x)limx→ag(x)\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \frac{\lim_{x \to a}f(x)}{\lim_{x \to a}g(x)}? You seemed to gloss over this by assuming that it's always true.

If the function is continuous and differentiable?
 
Mark44 said:
Under what conditions is it true that ##\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \frac{\lim_{x \to a}f(x)}{\lim_{x \to a}g(x)}##?
Kolika28 said:
If the function is continuous and differentiable?
Differentiability isn't necessary. If both limits on the right side of the equation I wrote exist, and the limit in the denominator is not zero, then the quotient of the limits equals the limit of the quotients.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and Delta2
I
Mark44 said:
Differentiability isn't necessary. If both limits on the right side of the equation I wrote exist, and the limit in the denominator is not zero, then the quotient of the limits equals the limit of the quotients.

I have been looking at the information you have given me, and I finally understand it! Thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K