Help with Recurrence Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on solving a recurrence equation related to calculating rotations at joints in multi-storey steel structures. The participants discuss iterative methods for approximating values of theta(i) and emphasize the importance of initial values at boundary points for convergence. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding the recurrence relations as presented in the referenced book, particularly in the context of even and odd numbered joints. The iterative approach is recommended for calculating terms in the sequence until satisfactory convergence is achieved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of recurrence relations in mathematics
  • Familiarity with iterative methods in computational analysis
  • Basic knowledge of structural engineering principles
  • Experience with convergence techniques in numerical methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the iterative methods for solving recurrence equations in structural analysis
  • Learn about convergence criteria in numerical methods
  • Explore computational fluid dynamics techniques related to iterative solutions
  • Review the specific recurrence relations used in multi-storey steel structure calculations
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and professionals involved in computational analysis of multi-storey steel structures will benefit from this discussion.

Tygra
Messages
55
Reaction score
8
TL;DR
Equation that calculates joint rotations in a multi-storey structure
Hi there,

I am going through a book on multi-storey steel structures and I have come to a chapter that gives approximate methods to calculate rotations at the joints (The intersecting members) of a rigid frame. There is a recurrence equation that computes the rotations and this is given below:

equation.png


The book mentions a few strategies to solve this equation. However, I am finding it quite difficult. The book mentions that you can use iterative methods and that you can start by approximating theta(i) as:

1716036446853.png


Is there anybody that can help with this, please?

Many thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I've never seen a recurrence formula like the one you showed. In all of the recurrence relations I've seen, to get the n-th value in the chain, you need one or more of the preceding values, plus a starting value or values. For example, a common recurrence relation for factorial numbers is given by ##n! = n \cdot (n - 1)!##, with ##1! = 1##.
Personally, I would use the iterative formula you wrote for ##\theta_i## to calculate as many terms in the sequence as you need.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
Hi Mark44,

I have no experience with reccurence relations. Its just the book called it that.

Would you be so kind to a have a read through the section of the book to see if it becomes more clear to you. Here are some images of the section. Read from equation (2.23) for the first image.



20240518_160403.jpg


20240518_160456.jpg


20240518_160507.jpg


If you are strunggling to read the text I can manually type out the section if you like?

Many thanks
 
Mark44 said:
I've never seen a recurrence formula like the one you showed. In all of the recurrence relations I've seen, to get the n-th value in the chain, you need one or more of the preceding values, plus a starting value or values. For example, a common recurrence relation for factorial numbers is given by ##n! = n \cdot (n - 1)!##, with ##1! = 1##.
Personally, I would use the iterative formula you wrote for ##\theta_i## to calculate as many terms in the sequence as you need.
Good point! This looks more like the situation with computational fluid dynamics, where the value at each point (i'th) depends on all surrounding values. That requires iteratively converging to a solution that is all compatible and consistent. I have no experience with those techniques, but I am sure that the solution depends on the initial values at all the boundary points. In this case, it would include assumptions about the initial values at both the bottom and top story.
 
Last edited:
Hi FactChecker,

well it does say in the book at even numbered joints (joint 2, 4...etc) the assumption is made that theta(i-1) = theta(i) = theta(i+1) and that it followws that:

1716056009685.png



It goes on to say that the initial values are obtained from the above formula (at even numbered joints). Next, the odd numbered joints for the first approximations are calculated from:

1716056506111.png

Next, improved values can be calculated at even numbered joints from this equation. Lastly, it says the equation is then used alternately for the set of both odd and even numbered joints until a satisfactory degree of convergence is achieved.

This is quite double dutch to me. I really need some help with it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
914
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
757
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K