Help with Reducing an Equation into Jacobi Identity Form

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
Messages
665
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement


Reduce the equation [tex]\partial_\mu {*} F^{\mu \nu} = 0[/tex] into the following form of the Jacobi Identity:

[tex]\partial_\lambda F_{\mu \nu} + \partial_\mu F_{\lambda \nu} + \partial_\nu F_{\lambda \mu} = 0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I can't figure out what the '*' is supposed to be. My first thought was that it was a typo and is meant to signify a dot product, but the partial derivative is not a vector, so I don't see how this could be the case.

At any rate, this problem seems straightforward but I could use some help getting started.

Thanks for your thoughts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi kreil! :smile:

(have a curly d: ∂ and a mu and an nu: µν :wink:)

the clue is in the alteration of the position of the indices …

this is ∂µ(*Fµν) :wink:

(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hodge_dual" )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Tim, I figured it was an operator of some sort but my notes/book were not immediately helpful in figuring out what it was.

In a previous problem we used the following form for F,

[tex]F_{\mu \nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu[/tex]

I'm having trouble seeing how the dual operator works on this form of F. Assuming a more general form, is the following true?

*[tex]F^{\mu \nu} = \left ( F^\mu e_\mu + F^\nu e_\nu + F^\lambda e_\lambda \right ) e_\mu e_\nu e_\lambda = F_{\nu \lambda} + F_{\mu \lambda} + F_{\mu \nu}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
hi kreil! :smile:

i've never really grasped the index way of doing it :redface:

i always think of it this way …

i see Fµν as a wedge product Exx∧t + Eyy∧t + Ezz∧t + Bxy∧z + Byz∧x + Bzx∧y

then for "curl" i wedge-multiply by ∂∧ = ∂xx∧ + ∂yy∧ + ∂zz∧ + ∂tt∧,

and use the equivalence x∧y∧z → *t, y∧z∧t → *x, z∧x∧t → *y, x∧y∧t → *z

(the jacobi identity is written in triple-wedges x∧y∧z etc)

i seem to remember there's a fairly good description of this in (surprisingly) Misner Thorne and Wheeler "Gravitation"