Maxwell equations from tensor notation to component notation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on verifying the equivalence of the expression ##\partial_{\mu}F_{\nu\lambda}+\partial_{\nu}F_{\lambda\mu}+\partial_{\lambda}F_{\mu\nu}## with the antisymmetrized form ##\partial_{[\mu}F_{\nu\lambda]}=0##. The derivation confirms that both expressions are equivalent to the electromagnetic field equations ##\tilde{\epsilon}^{ijk}\partial_{j}E_{k}+\partial_{0}B^{i}=0## and ##\partial_{i}B^{i}=0##. The solution employs the definition of antisymmetrization and demonstrates the necessary steps to arrive at the conclusion definitively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and operations
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations in differential form
  • Knowledge of antisymmetrization in tensor calculus
  • Basic concepts of electromagnetism, particularly electric and magnetic fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of antisymmetric tensors in detail
  • Learn about the implications of Maxwell's equations in different coordinate systems
  • Explore the relationship between tensor calculus and differential geometry
  • Investigate the physical significance of the electromagnetic field tensor ##F_{\nu\lambda}##
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and tensor analysis, as well as educators teaching advanced physics concepts.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



Verify that ##\partial_{\mu}F_{\nu\lambda}+\partial_{\nu}F_{\lambda\mu}+\partial_{\lambda}F_{\mu\nu}## is equivalent to ##\partial_{[\mu}F_{\nu\lambda]}=0##,

and that they are both equivalent to ##\tilde{\epsilon}^{ijk}\partial_{j}E_{k}+\partial_{0}B^{i}=0## and ##\partial_{i}B^{i}=0##.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



##\partial_{[\mu}F_{\nu\lambda]}=0##

##\implies \frac{1}{3!}(\partial_{\mu}F_{\nu\lambda}-\partial_{\mu}F_{\lambda\nu}-\partial_{\nu}F_{\mu\lambda}+\partial_{\nu}F_{\lambda\mu}-\partial_{\lambda}F_{\nu\mu}+\partial_{\lambda}F_{\mu\nu})=0##, using the definition of antisymmetrization of a tensor

##\implies \partial_{\mu}F_{\nu\lambda}-\partial_{\mu}F_{\lambda\nu}-\partial_{\nu}F_{\mu\lambda}+\partial_{\nu}F_{\lambda\mu}-\partial_{\lambda}F_{\nu\mu}+\partial_{\lambda}F_{\mu\nu}=0##

##\implies \partial_{\mu}F_{\nu\lambda}+\partial_{\mu}F_{\nu\lambda}+\partial_{\nu}F_{\lambda\mu}+\partial_{\nu}F_{\lambda\mu}+\partial_{\lambda}F_{\mu\nu}+\partial_{\lambda}F_{\mu\nu}=0##

##\implies 2(\partial_{\mu}F_{\nu\lambda}+\partial_{\nu}F_{\lambda\mu}+\partial_{\lambda}F_{\mu\nu})=0##

##\implies \partial_{\mu}F_{\nu\lambda}+\partial_{\nu}F_{\lambda\mu}+\partial_{\lambda}F_{\mu\nu}=0##

Is my working so far correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, I believe so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K