MHB Help with Unfinished Problem: File Size Issues

  • Thread starter Thread starter csmith23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Voltage
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around resolving a circuit problem involving an independent current source and its voltage drop. The participant initially struggles with the relationship between the current source and the power source, noting their parallel configuration. After applying Kirchhoff's voltage law, they calculate a voltage of 85 volts, which is confirmed by another participant. The calculations involve node analysis and current laws, leading to the conclusion that the current is 6 amps. The thread highlights the importance of circuit laws in determining voltage and current relationships.
csmith23
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello all. I am doing a basic circuit problem but ran got into a bind. I have a independent current source and need help finding the voltage drop of that current source. I did some research and found that current sources will always carry the same voltage as the power source no matter what's in between. However this independent current source as a voltage dependent on the same node as the current source, but the power source is parallel to the current source. Thanks in advance!

View attachment 3951

Help on unfinished problem

Im really hoping everyone can access this. I tried a million different file types and it constantly said I exceeded the file size.
 

Attachments

  • voltage.jpg
    voltage.jpg
    30 KB · Views: 96
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi csmith23,

I am also learning circuits right now and so I could be wrong, but have you tried applying Kirchoffs' voltage law around the first loop?
 
I did that shortly after posting this. And I got 85 volts. Can anyone confirm if that is correct?
 
Yep! I got the same answer.

$$V_A=V_x+4V_y+10i=4+4(5)+10(6)=85V$$
I got $i=6$ by applying KCL around the first node.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top