Help with variable mass on a slope question

Click For Summary
An armoured car on a slope is analyzed after a missile is fired horizontally from it. The initial calculations suggest the car's velocity up the slope is around 1.8 m/s, with some variations in estimates due to the angle of the slope. Momentum conservation equations are used, but the directionality of the vectors complicates the calculations. Discussions highlight the need to consider both horizontal and vertical components of momentum, leading to differing conclusions about the car's final velocity. The final consensus indicates that the correct velocity, after factoring in the slope, is approximately 1.8 m/s.
Nate-2016
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An armoured car with a mass of 5 tonnes is located on a smooth plane which is inclined at an angle of tan-1 (5/12) to the horizontal as shown in Figure Q3. A missile of mass 15kg is fired horizontally from this armoured car at 650m/s. Determine the velocity with which the armoured car will begin to travel up the inclined plane.

upload_2016-5-12_11-12-12.png
[/B]

Homework Equations



I think that a momentum equation needs to be used, but I am not sure how to apply that equation to a slope.

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer to the question is 1.8m/s. The closest I have got to it is 1.9m/s. This is my attempt.

0 = mdv - Mv
dv+v = 650m/s
mdv = Mv
mx(650-v) = Mv
15x(650-v) = 5000v
v = (15x650) / (15+5000)
v = 1.94 m/s

At which point do I taken into consideration the angle of the slope?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whenever you choose.
When you draw up your equation, mdv = Mv, you are saying (I think?) that the momentum of the shell is equal to the momentum of the AC. Since v is a vector, you need to take the directions into account. But the shell is fired horizontally and the AC moves up the slope and you should take the angle into consideration here.
But you could consider momentum independently in horizontal and vertical directions. Then your equation is presumably looking only at the horizontal component of momentum and you have calculated the horizontal component of the AC velocity. So now you consider the slope.

I agree with your 1.95m/sec (I think you maybe got 1.96?) and I can see how someone might then get 1.8m/s by considering the slope, but I don't agree with that. I get 2.11m/sec for the AC velocity up the slope.
 
  • Like
Likes Nate-2016
Thank you for explaining that to me. I have now taken into consideration the angle of the slope at the very end of my equation.
My new equation is now

0 = mdv - Mv
dv+v = 650m/s
mdv = Mv
mx(650-v) = Mv
15x(650-v) = 5000v
v = (15x650) / (15+5000)
v = 1.94 m/s x cos(tan^1(5/12))
v = 1.79 or 1.8 m/s

Solved.
Really appreciate your help.
 
Yes. That's how I thought they got 1.8 m/s.
I hope a real physicist might take a look, because I don't believe that answer.
If 1.94m/s is the horizontal component of the AC velocity, then the velocity of the AC up the slope must be greater, in fact 1.95 / cos(tan-1(5/12)) or simply 1.95 x 13/12
If you were given the velocity of the AC up the slope, say 1m/s, then asked what were the horizontal and vertical components of its velocity, you'd get two smaller numbers (H=12/13 and v=5/13). So now you have its horizontal component, the actual velocity must be larger.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K