Henri poincare got a 35 on an iq test?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathguy15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Iq Poincare Test
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 14K views
Mathguy15
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I read here http://www.eoht.info/page/Genius that henri poincare got a 35 on an iq test. I think that is really interesting, if its true! I've heard that people with mental deficiency score in the 60's, so 35 would be really low! I used to think iq meant something years ago, but I dropped that in 9th grade, when I realized I could do math without a "high" IQ, but now I'm of the opinion that IQ is very useless except under very limited contexts! thoughts?

Thanks,
Mathguy15
 
Last edited by a moderator:
on Phys.org


From your link:
The classic example to illustrate this is the fact that French mathematician Henri Poincare took the Binet intelligence test and scored at the imbecile level (IQ=35): “Had he been judged as a child instead of the famous mathematician he was, he would have been rated by the test as an imbecile.”

More likely, a classic example of a "fact" misinterpreted out of context.

Binet was one of the early pioneers of intelligence testing, and scored his tests to indicate the "mental age" of the subject. The web page doesn't say at what physical age Poincare was tested, but "a mental age of 35" isn't "an imbecile", on any reasonable interpretation.
 


Mathguy15 said:
I read here http://www.eoht.info/page/Genius that henri poincare got a 35 on an iq test. I think that is really interesting, if its true! I've heard that people with mental deficiency score in the 60's, so 35 would be really low! I used to think iq meant something years ago, but I dropped that in 9th grade, when I realized I could do math without a "high" IQ, but now I'm of the opinion that IQ is very useless except under very limited contexts! thoughts?

Thanks,
Mathguy15

I can't really find a reputable source for this claim.
 


micromass said:
Imbecile is (or was) the official name of an IQ between 26 and 50. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imbecile

Binet didn't use the "modern" standard IQ scale with mean = 100 and SD = 15, because that was not invented until after Binet and Poincare were both dead.

He was mainly interested in the development of young children and was trying to measure their "mental age" compared with their physical age. That type of scale doesn't make much sense for adults, or even for adolescents, but Binet wasn't trying to measure adult intelligence.
 


AlephZero said:
From your link:


More likely, a classic example of a "fact" misinterpreted out of context.

Binet was one of the early pioneers of intelligence testing, and scored his tests to indicate the "mental age" of the subject. The web page doesn't say at what physical age Poincare was tested, but "a mental age of 35" isn't "an imbecile", on any reasonable interpretation.

According to Wiki, Binet made major revisions of his intelligence test just prior to his death in 1911.
If Poincare was tested in, say, the period 1908-1911, he would have been in his mid-fifties.
If there is anything valuable about Binet's original testing method, a mental age of 35 ought to be a PEAK value in his system.
A middle-aged man retaining his youthful mental agility is quite impressive..
 


AlephZero said:
Binet didn't use the "modern" standard IQ scale with mean = 100 and SD = 15, because that was not invented until after Binet and Poincare were both dead.

He was mainly interested in the development of young children and was trying to measure their "mental age" compared with their physical age. That type of scale doesn't make much sense for adults, or even for adolescents, but Binet wasn't trying to measure adult intelligence.

okay, that's why it was "35".