Hermitian Operators in quantum mechanics

  • #1
ultimateguy
125
1

Homework Statement


Within the framework of quantum mechanics, show that the following are Hermitian operators:

a) [tex]p=-i\hbar\bigtriangledown[/tex]

b) [tex]L=-i\hbar r\times\bigtriangledown[/tex]

Hint: In Cartesian form L is a linear combination of noncommuting Hermitian operators.

Homework Equations



[tex]\int\psi_{1}^{*}\L\psi_{2}d\tau=\int(\L\psi_{1})^{*}\psi_{2}d\tau[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that a Hermitian operator is self-adjoint, and that it's eigenvalues are real, but as far as proving it, I'm not exactly sure how to use the formula above to do that.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
quantumdude
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,575
23
You need to insert the operator into each side of the identity separately and show that they both work out to the same quantity. That means you'll be manipulating one integrand until it looks like the other one.
 
  • #3
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
621
And consider integration by parts to move the derivative operators.
 
  • #4
ultimateguy
125
1
[tex]\int\psi^{*}(\frac{\delta\psi_{2}}{\delta x}+\frac{\delta\psi_{2}}{\delta y}+\frac{\delta\psi_{2}}{\delta z})d\tau[/tex]

So do I start off like this? If [tex]\psi[/tex] is a function of x, y and z then how do I handle the integration by parts? (The textbook does it, but only dependent on one variable)
 
  • #5
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
621
You do it just the same way as with one variable. (?) I'm not sure what is confusing you. Split the integral into three separate parts if you need to.
 
  • #6
quantumdude
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,575
23
That expression in parentheses in the integrand doesn't look much like [itex]\nabla(\psi_2)[/itex] to me.

how do I handle the integration by parts? (The textbook does it, but only dependent on one variable)

You're working in Cartesian coordinates, which all appear symmetrically in your integrand. So you have the luxury of working out the 1D problem (say, in x) and then saying "Similarly, we have for y and z..."
 
  • #7
ultimateguy
125
1
I think I got it,

[tex]\int\psi_1^*(-i\hbar\bigtriangledown\psi_2)d\tau=-i\hbar\psi_1^*\psi_2+\int i\hbar\bigtriangledown\psi_1^*\psi_2 d\tau[/tex]

Since [tex]\psi_1^*\psi_2=0[/tex] (eigenfunctions are orthogonal) then

[tex]\int\psi_1^* (-i\hbar\bigtriangledown\psi_2)d\tau=\int i\hbar\bigtriangledown\psi_1^*\psi_2 d\tau[/tex]

Which is the same as above equation. Is this right?
 
  • #8
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
621
I'm afraid it's not orthogonality. The expression without an integral sign on it should be a difference betwen its values at + and - infinity. What is the the answer?
 
  • #9
ultimateguy
125
1
So it's zero because it's basically [tex]-\infty+\infty[/tex]?
 
  • #10
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
621
Nooooo. You usually assume wave functions vanish at infinity or have some other similar boundary condition.
 
  • #11
quantumdude
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,575
23
Also, here's another nitpick.

This:

[tex]\int\psi_1^* (-i\hbar\bigtriangledown\psi_2)d\tau=\int i\hbar\bigtriangledown\psi_1^*\psi_2 d\tau[/tex]

Should be carried one step further to this:

[tex]\int\psi_1^* (-i\hbar\bigtriangledown\psi_2)d\tau=\int (-i\hbar\bigtriangledown\psi_1)^*\psi_2 d\tau[/tex]
 
  • #12
ultimateguy
125
1
I did part b) using the same method, but only the x component. (Since from cross product I get a vector.) Am I required to prove for each component, or is the linear combination hint enough to extend this proof to all components?
 
  • #13
quantumdude
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,575
23
Like I said, the symmetry of Cartesian coordinates affords you the luxury of generalizing your argument for one component to the others with a minimum of trouble. You don't have to do it all again.
 
  • #14
ultimateguy
125
1
Thank you!
 

Suggested for: Hermitian Operators in quantum mechanics

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
349
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
653
Replies
2
Views
946
  • Last Post
2
Replies
43
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
325
Replies
1
Views
181
Replies
5
Views
748
Top