Hessian matrix of the Newtonian potential is zero?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hessian matrix of the Newtonian potential, represented as \(\partial^2\phi / \partial x_i \partial x_j\), is shown to equal zero under the assumption of constant mass and specific manipulations of derivatives. The derivation involves using Newton's second law \(F = m \cdot d^2 x / d t^2 = - \nabla \phi\) and the properties of partial derivatives in Cartesian coordinates. However, the conclusion that the Hessian is zero is incorrect due to the improper swapping of differentiation orders, as acceleration is time-dependent and cannot be treated as a function of spatial coordinates alone.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and their properties
  • Knowledge of Hessian matrices in multivariable calculus
  • Basic concepts of classical mechanics and potential theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of mixed partial derivatives in multivariable calculus
  • Study the relationship between acceleration and time-dependent coordinates
  • Explore the implications of Newton's laws in non-inertial reference frames
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of potential theory in classical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying classical mechanics, particularly those interested in the mathematical treatment of potentials and forces in physics.

Chain
Messages
35
Reaction score
3
So I'm looking at the hessian of the Newtonian potential:

\partial^2\phi / \partial x_i \partial x_j

Using the fact that (assuming the mass is constant):

F = m \cdot d^2 x / d t^2 = - \nabla \phi

This implies:

\partial^2\phi / \partial x_i \partial x_j = -m \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial x_j} (d^2 x_i / d t^2) = -m \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial x_j} (\partial^2 x_i / \partial t^2)

As we can swap the total derivatives for partial derivatives since for Cartesian coordinates:

\partial x_i / \partial x_j = \delta_{ij}

Using the fact that we can swap the order of differentiation for mixed partials (assuming continuity of the partial derivatives) we obtain:

\partial^2\phi / \partial x_i \partial x_j = -m \cdot \partial^3 x_i / \partial x_j \partial t^2 = -m \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial t^2} \partial x_i / \partial x_j = -m \cdot 0 = 0

Hence I obtain the result that the hessian of the Newtonian potential is zero which can't possibly be correct but I can't find the error in my calculation.

Any help would be much appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you wrote doesn't make too much sense and the mathematical manipulations are illegal. Acceleration depends on time, coordinate depends on time: a(x) = a(t(x)). Good luck reverting x(t) into t(x).
 
So the problem is in the last step where I swap the order of differentiation because it is not possible to find time as a function of position?

I guess the proper expression for the differential of acceleration with respect to a spatial coordinate is:

\partial a(t(x)) / \partial x = \frac{\partial a(t)}{\partial t} \cdot \frac{\partial t}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial a(t)}{\partial t} \cdot (\frac{\partial x}{\partial t})^{-1}

Which is clearly non-zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K