Hibbeler 12-210: Solving Constraint Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter c0der
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
c0der
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Attached

Homework Equations



Attached my constraint equations

The Attempt at a Solution



How is sa + sb = d at any stage of motion (circled in the attachment)?
 

Attachments

  • Hibbeler 12th edition 12-210.png
    Hibbeler 12th edition 12-210.png
    28.7 KB · Views: 639
Physics news on Phys.org
Pretend just block A moves (B is at rest). Then isn't it obvious A has to move d=3 meters? So sa = d, sb = 0.

Pretend only block B moves. Isn't it obvious block B has to move 3m since A is stationary and d is the distance from the left side of A to the left side of B. So sb = 3 and sa = 0.

So by superposition, if they can both move, sa + sb = d.
 
Thank you, it makes sense that A and B together must travel a distance of 3m so that the right end of B is at the left end of A. However isn't sb+sa misleading as they're measured from the datum? It should be deltaSa + deltaSb = d ?
 
c0der said:
Thank you, it makes sense that A and B together must travel a distance of 3m so that the right end of B is at the left end of A. However isn't sb+sa misleading as they're measured from the datum? It should be deltaSa + deltaSb = d ?

Very good point! But it looks like in the text on the right they decided to make sa and sb both positive by definition, which as you point out is not what the arrows on the diagram on the left define. So, good point but their method still gives the right answer.

In other words, sb should be negative going by the picture arrows but then superposition is sa + (- sb) = sa - sb. Amounts to same thing.
 
I think they mean dsa and dsb but when you integrate from zero to dsa or zero to dsb, they become sa and sb anyway as it's sa-0, sb-0. Either way it makes sense, thanks for your help