Hibbeler 12-210: Solving Constraint Equations

  • Thread starter c0der
  • Start date
In summary, the text on the right defines sa and sb as positive by definition, but the picture on the left shows that sa and sb are actually negative when measured from the left side of the diagram. This means that by superposition, if they can both move, sa + sb = d.
  • #1
c0der
54
0

Homework Statement



Attached

Homework Equations



Attached my constraint equations

The Attempt at a Solution



How is sa + sb = d at any stage of motion (circled in the attachment)?
 

Attachments

  • Hibbeler 12th edition 12-210.png
    Hibbeler 12th edition 12-210.png
    28.7 KB · Views: 576
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Pretend just block A moves (B is at rest). Then isn't it obvious A has to move d=3 meters? So sa = d, sb = 0.

Pretend only block B moves. Isn't it obvious block B has to move 3m since A is stationary and d is the distance from the left side of A to the left side of B. So sb = 3 and sa = 0.

So by superposition, if they can both move, sa + sb = d.
 
  • #3
Thank you, it makes sense that A and B together must travel a distance of 3m so that the right end of B is at the left end of A. However isn't sb+sa misleading as they're measured from the datum? It should be deltaSa + deltaSb = d ?
 
  • #4
c0der said:
Thank you, it makes sense that A and B together must travel a distance of 3m so that the right end of B is at the left end of A. However isn't sb+sa misleading as they're measured from the datum? It should be deltaSa + deltaSb = d ?

Very good point! But it looks like in the text on the right they decided to make sa and sb both positive by definition, which as you point out is not what the arrows on the diagram on the left define. So, good point but their method still gives the right answer.

In other words, sb should be negative going by the picture arrows but then superposition is sa + (- sb) = sa - sb. Amounts to same thing.
 
  • #5
I think they mean dsa and dsb but when you integrate from zero to dsa or zero to dsb, they become sa and sb anyway as it's sa-0, sb-0. Either way it makes sense, thanks for your help
 

FAQ: Hibbeler 12-210: Solving Constraint Equations

1. What is Hibbeler 12-210: Solving Constraint Equations?

Hibbeler 12-210 is a method for solving constraint equations in engineering and physics problems. It was developed by renowned engineer and author, R.C. Hibbeler, and is widely used in the fields of mechanics and structural analysis.

2. How does Hibbeler 12-210 work?

Hibbeler 12-210 involves breaking down a complex system into smaller, simpler components and then using mathematical equations to find the unknown forces or reactions at each component. This allows for the solution of constraint equations, which are equations that represent the relationship between these forces and reactions.

3. What types of problems can Hibbeler 12-210 solve?

Hibbeler 12-210 is primarily used for solving problems in mechanics and structural analysis, such as analyzing the forces acting on a bridge or determining the stresses in a truss system. It can also be applied to other engineering and physics problems that involve constraint equations.

4. Is Hibbeler 12-210 difficult to learn?

Hibbeler 12-210 can be challenging to learn, especially for those without a strong background in mathematics or engineering. However, with practice and a thorough understanding of the concepts, it can be a powerful tool for solving complex problems.

5. Are there any alternatives to Hibbeler 12-210 for solving constraint equations?

Yes, there are other methods for solving constraint equations such as the Lagrange multiplier method and the principle of virtual work. However, Hibbeler 12-210 is a widely used and effective method that is often preferred in engineering and physics applications.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top