Higgs boson and metastable universe

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the implications of the Higgs boson and its mass on the stability of the universe, particularly the concepts of stable, unstable, and metastable states. Participants explore the Higgs potential and its role in determining the universe's fate over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references an article discussing the Higgs boson's mass and its implications for the universe's stability, questioning the meaning of a metastable universe.
  • Another participant explains the Higgs potential V(φ), noting that it is a quartic polynomial that determines the Higgs vacuum state and the mass of the Higgs boson.
  • There is a discussion about the potential going to -∞ and its implications, with one participant suggesting that this indicates a lack of stable states and a "falling" to lower energy states.
  • A participant mentions that if the quartic coupling constant becomes negative, vacuum decay could occur, leading to catastrophic consequences for the universe.
  • Reference is made to the Coleman and De Luccia paper from the 1970s, which studied the dynamics of vacuum decay.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the implications of the Higgs potential and its behavior, particularly regarding stability and vacuum decay. There is no consensus on the exact consequences or interpretations of these phenomena.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of the Higgs potential and its dependence on parameters such as the top quark's mass. The implications of vacuum decay and the conditions under which it occurs remain unresolved.

Einj
Messages
464
Reaction score
59
Hi all. I have recently read an article that summarizes our knowledge about Higgs boson and the consequences of its existence and of the value of its mass. The author says that our universe could be stable, unstable or metastable and that the discrimination between this three options is give by the values of the higgs boson's and top quark's masses. He also says that, in the case that our universe would be metastable, in 13.5 billions year it will become (translate from Italian) "unstable with a potential that goes to -∞".
What does that mean? Of what kind of potential are we talking about??

Thanks to all
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He's talking about the Higgs potential V(φ) which describes the interaction of the Higgs field with itself. This is input to the theory as a quartic polynomial. Its minimum determines the Higgs vacuum state, located at a value φ0 = 246 GeV. Excitations from that minimum are Higgs bosons, and the second derivative of V(φ) at that point determines the the Higgs boson's mass.

But quantum modifications will modify the shape of the potential, depending on various parameters, including the top quark's mass. If there was no minimum the universe would be unstable. Of course that is not the case. But even if there is a minimum, V(φ) may go to -∞ at φ → ∞. In this case the universe could eventually tunnel through the barrier. Then the universe would be metastable.
 
Thank you very much. :biggrin:
Just let me check if I understood well. If the Higgs potential goes to -∞ what does that imply? I suppose that there is no stable state and so we could have something like a "falling" to states with energy always lower than the previous one right?
 
If the quartic coupling constant goes negative the generally agreed upon answer is that something known as vacuum decay occurs, which is a very traumatic event as it effectively ends the universe.

The dynamics of this type of physics was studied by Coleman and De Luccia back in the 1970s.
 
Ok, I'll search something about this. Thank you very much.
 
Thanks, Haelfix. The Coleman-De Luccia paper is available online here.
 
Its also Higgs is an elementary particle. I was stabbing at it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K