Higgs boson re-discovery from a CERN dataset (for a project)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a seminar project focused on rediscovering the Higgs boson using a CERN dataset. The user is struggling to identify the gap around the Higgs boson mass (125 GeV) in the invariant mass diagram and has not observed anything unusual in their histogram of Z boson invariant masses. Participants inquire about the dataset's size and analysis methods, suggesting that the Z peak appears too small to detect the Higgs boson. Clarifications are requested regarding the specific cuts used in the analysis and the dataset link. Understanding these details is crucial for accurately identifying the Higgs boson signature in the data.
omerel
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Seminar Project
Relevant Equations
H -> ZZ -> 4l (muons)
Hi everyone!
I'm working on a seminar project on elementary particles, and I'm supposed to introduce the LHC and rediscover the Higgs boson from a dataset I got from CERN open source.
I don't understand how am I supposed to discover the gap (in the invariant mass diagram) around the Higgs boson mass (125 GeV).
I've watched CERN's official video on the Higgs discovery (Higgs boson decay to two photons), and several code implementations relevant to my problem (H->ZZ->4l) and couldn't understand the idea of how you actually see the gap around 125 GeV?
When I plot the histogram of Z boson invariant masses, I do not see anything unusual.
For your convenience, I attached two of my histograms- one for Z boson pairs invariant mass (i.e came from the same decay) and the second is the invariant mass of a single Z boson invariant mass. The invariant mass is in GeV units. pairs.PNG
 

Attachments

  • single.PNG
    single.PNG
    4.7 KB · Views: 142
Physics news on Phys.org
What is this gap you are talking about?

What is the dataset you are looking at? Is it big enough to see the Higgs? The Z peak seems awfully small.
 
Can you provide more information on how you analyzed the data? E.g. cuts used and so on. Also provide a link to the dataset

One Z is off shell so you can not write "invariant mass of two Z" here
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top