I Higher Dimensional Spheres viz. Cubes

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spheres
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,394
Reaction score
2,755
This is about Euclidian geometry in n dimensions. On this subject it is often noted that the volume of the unit sphere goes to zero as n increases. However this has more to do with the unit cube getting larger than the sphere growing smaller. As n increases the diagonal of the unit cube grows without bound while the diameter of the unit sphere remains constant, so the result is no surprise.

How about comparing what happens with spheres and cubes both with volume one? Then the sphere can also grow. Things cancel out nicely so using Stirling's approximation we get that with large n

(diagonal of cube)/(diameter of sphere) = (pi*e/2)^1/2 = approx. 2.066.

That is, the "diameter" of the cube is a bit more than twice that of the sphere of the same volume.
Taking it a step further, we can show that for large n a unit cube of dimension n/4 (rounded down) or less can be entirely enclosed by an n dimensional unit volume sphere.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suppose we have a unit volume n-ball and n-cube that share the same center. How large is their intersection?

The volume of their intersection goes to zero at a rate of roughly 1/sqrt(n). Both figures grow at the same rate but in different directions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top