History of Fibonacci Series & Difference from Maclaurin & Taylor

  • Thread starter Thread starter aeterminator1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Fibonacci series is a sequence of integers defined by the recurrence relation x(n) = x(n-1) + x(n-2), with initial conditions x(1) = x(2) = 1, resulting in the sequence 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, etc. In contrast, the Taylor series is a mathematical representation of functions as an infinite sum of terms calculated from the values of their derivatives at a single point, exemplified by the series for sin(x). The discussion highlights the historical context of the Fibonacci series and its relationship to the golden ratio, while also addressing misconceptions regarding its aesthetic significance in architecture, particularly in relation to the Parthenon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical sequences and series
  • Familiarity with the Fibonacci sequence and its properties
  • Knowledge of Taylor series and their applications
  • Basic concepts of the golden ratio and its mathematical significance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical properties of the Fibonacci sequence and its applications in nature
  • Study the derivation and applications of Taylor series in calculus
  • Explore the significance of the golden ratio in mathematics and art
  • Read "The Golden Section: Nature's Greatest Secret" by Scot Olsen for a deeper understanding of the golden ratio
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying calculus and sequences, and anyone interested in the historical and practical applications of the Fibonacci series and Taylor series.

aeterminator1
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
what is the history of it and how is it different from maclaurin and taylor series
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
One is a sequence of integers, the other is an approximation of a function by a power series. How is bread different from music?

As I pointed out to yet another poster: JFGI. Inserting the words fibonnacci and sequence into a google search will give you a whole plethora of information - far more than anyone here could ever (be bothered to) write down.
 
matt grime said:
How is bread different from music?

That made my day!
 
haha... or look up the breadfish, perhaps? :-p

In the movie Pi, the main guy gives a brief explanation on the fibonacci series to another character, explaining how it also relates to the golden ratio etc. And yes, as a movie, it's bound to have flaws in the accuracy of the actual maths presented. One of the equations written is apparently slightly erroneous, and I quote from imdb:

Max writes the golden ratio as (a/b) = (a/a+b). It should be a/b = (a+b)/a, if, by definition, a>b.


But hey, it may just be a more interesting approach in understanding this stuff than by laborously filtering through the googolplex. Pretty standard approach, heh. :wink: You can also get films, music--various symphonies-- set to the golden ratio. Amazing. Oh, the Parthenon too, but hey, that was one of many achievements set by the Greeks. Those Greeks... :rolleyes:
 
CellarDoor said:
Oh, the Parthenon too, but hey, that was one of many achievements set by the Greeks. Those Greeks... :rolleyes:

There is no evidence to support the assertion that phi, the golden ratio, is important in greek architecture, or anywhere else, for non-mathematical reasons. Indeed, there are many elegant rebuttals of all the abuses of phi that exist. It does occur in nature for very good and well understood reasons (it has the 'slowest' converging rational approximation, in a sense that can be made precise), but none that supports any suggestion that is aesthetically pleasing.

The reason it 'occurs' in the parthenon is because some people choose to measure some ratios from some not well chosen positions. There are many rations one can write down from the parthenon that are not phi, but those are all conveniently ignored.
 
Last edited:
matt grime said:
It does occur in nature for very good and well understood reasons (it has the 'slowest' converging rational approximation, in a sense that can be made precise)
Could you make that more precise? :)
 
The book The Golden Section: Nature's Greatest Secret by Scot Olsen is all about the subject. It is a very light read. You could probally finish it one afternoon at a bookstore.
 
please give a simple explanation
 
  • #10
Eighty said:
Could you make that more precise? :)

Yes. But you could equally well do a google search and save me the bother.

Or looke here

http://www.maa.org/devlin/devlin_06_04.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
aeterminator1 said:
please give a simple explanation

Of what? The difference between Fibonnacci series and power series?

Here is the Fibonnacci sequence

1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,...

if x(n) is the n'th term it satisfies the rule x(n)=x(n-1)+x(n-2), and x(1)=x(2)=1.

A Taylor seres looks like this:

sin(x)=x-x^3/3! +x^5/5! - ...I don't see that there is anything that needs to be said to explain that they are different.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K