Homebuilt Seismograph -- Feasible?

  • Context: Misc. 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gmax137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of building a homebuilt seismograph, prompted by recent small earthquakes in the participants' area. The conversation explores various designs, components, and challenges associated with constructing such a device, including data collection and local seismic event detection.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention various designs for seismographs, including those using lasers and photodetectors, which they believe may be easier than traditional inductive pickup designs.
  • There is a concern about the difference between measuring earthquakes and the movement of the seismometer itself, highlighting the need for proper installation, such as digging and pouring concrete.
  • One participant notes that their geophones can record local seismic events effectively and mentions the need for specific long-period sensors for distant events.
  • Another participant suggests building two seismographs to detect coincidences, potentially minimizing interference from nearby activities.
  • Resources and references to existing projects and articles on seismograph construction are shared, including a link to a Raspberry Shake community and a mention of past publications in 'Scientific American' and IEEE Spectrum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of ideas and approaches to building a seismograph, with no consensus on a single method or design. Multiple competing views and suggestions remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on specific designs and the challenges of data collection, which are not fully resolved in the discussion. The effectiveness of different seismograph types for local versus distant events is also a point of contention.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in DIY projects related to seismology, hobbyists exploring earthquake detection, and those looking for technical insights into building seismographs may find this discussion valuable.

gmax137
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Messages
3,165
Reaction score
3,757
Anyone here built a seismograph? I think maybe @davenn has done this?

We have had quite a few small quakes (like 2.2 to 3.2) near my house recently and it got me wondering about a new project. Feasible? I found a couple sites online but the ones I looked at are pretty old. Looking for any advice. Thanks!
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Physics news on Phys.org
Lots of people have done this, and there are many designs. Personally, mine would include lasers and photodetectors. That seems much easier than the inductive pickup designs that are most common.

One big issue is that measuring earthquakes isn't always the same as measuring movement of your seismometer. Be prepared to dig and pour concrete too. The Ligo prototypes at Caltech were really good at detecting people walking in the hallways and traffic passing on California Ave.

Also collecting and dealing with the data stream would be a big issue for me, it's also a SW project.

Here is some stuff from @davenn.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, DeBangis21, davenn and 3 others
gmax137 said:
Anyone here built a seismograph? I think maybe @davenn has done this?

We have had quite a few small quakes (like 2.2 to 3.2) near my house recently and it got me wondering about a new project. Feasible? I found a couple sites online but the ones I looked at are pretty old. Looking for any advice. Thanks!

Yes, there a few ways to do this ... but got local/regional events, geophones are the easiest way to go
on my site that @DaveE linked to ... thanks for the link to my site :smile: you will see both a 3 axis and a single geophone style. My geophyones will easily record a M2.0 out to around 120 km ... 70 miles.
They will also record the P waves of the big events out to 4 - 6000 km

For doing decent recordings of the moderate to big events at a long distance, then a more specific long period sensor is required. The common type if the "Lehman" seismometer as seen in the lower half of that linked page under the My First Lehman Construction

Any other Q's, feel free to ask :smile:

cheers
Dave
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, BillTre and berkeman
Thanks, @davenn ! I will spend some time looking at your site. I'm more interested in the events very local to my place.
 
As usual. Tom Waller's fabulous and, sadly, out of print, book Science Made Stupid, has the answer:

1698074460702.png


I remember people building these (well, real ones, not like Weller's) in junior high - the trick was getting a strip chart recorder. The suggestion of using a laser and some kind of photosensor is a good one. To minimize the effect of "swell party upstairs", I might build two and look for coincidences.

Oh, and gravity wave detectors can detect spider footsteps. (!)
 
You might also take a look at:
raspberryshake.org

A somewhat active group that uses siesometers based on geophones and the Raspberry PI development board.

Chers,
Tom
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137
Been a while, but I think 'Scientific American' --Back when it was serious-- did a nice seismometer in 'Amateur Scientist' department. I got a compilation of their projects on CD--
Ah, you still can !! Google/Bing may find it $_10 cheaper than eg A*z*n...
 
Spectrum magazine (October issue?), published by IEEE (Institute of Electric and Electronic Engineers) published an article.

It is available on-line at: https://spectrum.ieee.org/diy-seismometer

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137 and Nik_2213

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
13K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
21K