Homotopy Analysis Method (or Homotopy Perturbation Method)?

crackjack
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Homotopy Analysis Method (or Homotopy Perturbation Method)??

How effective is this Homotopy Analysis Method (HAM) in solving coupled non-linear PDE? I see some papers, but they seem to be cross-referencing a small group of people most of the time. This sounds strange for a method that is so generic and so powerful (and has been around since 1992), as those papers all say.

Homotopy Perturbation Method (HPM) is a recent variant of HAM. But this also seems to suffer from the same strange behaviors as HAM's papers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


"HAM" and "HPM" are methods for finding approximate solutions to non-linear equations. The WKB method used in Quantum Mechanics to solve Shrodinger's equation is an example of a "HPM".
 


Thanks for the reply.

I understand that it is an approximation method. But the difference from WKB seems to be that, in HAM, there is no apriori need for a small-parameter (with which to perturb). HAM introduces an artificial parameter with which a perturbation solution is constructed and then the parameter is taken to unity. The convergence of the solution is controlled by another parameter.

I want to know if HAM really brings something powerful to the table and, if so, why do I not see it beyond a relatively small self-referencing group.
 


I will ask my supervisor this, as he is an authority on this kind of stuff.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top