A Hooke's law, Bertrand's theorem and closed orbits

AI Thread Summary
Bertrand's Theorem states that only forces leading to closed orbits are those described by Hooke's law and the attractive inverse square law. The discussion focuses on demonstrating that Hooke's law, represented by the force equation f = -k r, results in closed orbits through the derived trajectory equation. The analysis reveals that the motion can be understood as three simple harmonic motions (SHM) along different axes, which are periodic and thus yield a closed orbit. The periodic nature of these oscillations is independent of amplitude, reinforcing the closed orbit concept. The conversation concludes with a reference to a visual representation of SHM orbits, emphasizing their elliptical nature.
Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
Bertrand's Theorem says : the only forces whose bounded orbits imply closed orbits are the Hooke's law and the attractive inverse square force.

I'm looking at the hookes law ##f=-k r## and try to see explicitly that the orbit is indeed closed.

I use the orbit equation ##\frac{d^{2} u}{d \theta^{2}}+u=\frac{-m}{l^{2} u^{2}} f\left(\frac{1}{u}\right)## with the force given as ##f=-k r## ,therefore I get ##\frac{d^{2} u}{d \theta^{2}}+u=+\frac{mk}{l^{2} u 3}## as the equation defining the trajectory.

However neither can I solve this nor can I see that the equation implies a closed orbit.

Can you please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kashmir said:
I'm looking at the hookes law ##f=-k r## and try to see explicitly that the orbit is indeed closed.

Hooke's law gives you harmonic oscillation along each axis in the orbital plane, with a period independent of max. amplitude, thus the same for both axes and equal to the orbital period:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_oscillator
 
A.T. said:
Hooke's law gives you harmonic oscillation along each axis in the orbital plane, with a period independent of max. amplitude, thus the same for both axes and equal to the orbital period:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_oscillator
Thank you. I got it. We've three SHM along three axis which are periodic, hence a closed orbit.
 
Kashmir said:
We've three SHM along three axis which are periodic, hence a closed orbit.

You can see the SHM orbit on the pound note below, where they placed the sun in the middle of an elliptical orbit. Newton doesn't look too happy about this.

One%2BPound%2BNote%2Bwith%2BIsaac%2BNewton.jpg
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top