Hooke's Law of a spring with a mass

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Hooke's Law to a spring that has mass, specifically addressing how the presence of mass affects tension and the dynamics of a spring-mass system. Participants explore theoretical implications, effective mass considerations, and the application of Newton's second law in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the tension in a spring does not depend on its mass, as elastic properties are linked to potential energy variations rather than mass.
  • Others argue that while the expression for force remains the same, the effective mass in dynamic situations must account for the spring's mass, suggesting a modification to the dynamics of the system.
  • A participant questions how to reconcile the application of Newton's second law to a block when considering a spring with mass, highlighting a perceived contradiction with effective mass concepts.
  • Some suggest modeling the spring as a continuous medium to account for the distribution of mass and acceleration along its length.
  • There is mention of using differential equations to derive more precise solutions for the motion of the spring, indicating that the dynamics are more complex than simple approximations.
  • A reference is provided to external material that discusses axial vibrations, suggesting methods to model the system more accurately.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of mass in spring dynamics, with no consensus reached on how to apply Newton's second law in this context. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the relationship between tension, effective mass, and the application of classical mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions made about the mass of the spring relative to the load mass and the approximation methods used in deriving effective mass. The discussion also highlights the complexity of modeling spring dynamics accurately.

bgq
Messages
162
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I know that for a massless spring the tension is T = kx, where k is a constant and x is the compression or elongation.

What is the expression of the tension if the spring has a mass m?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The tension (stress) does not depend on the mass of the spring.

Explanation: Elastic properties reflect the variation of the system potential energy with strain (spring extension). In an atomistic picture, the potential energy ultimately arises from interactions between electrons and nuclei, which do not depend measurably on the nuclear mass.

Massless springs are assumed for problems in which the mass hung on the spring is much larger than that of the spring. If this is not true, then the dynamics of the spring-mass system will change, but for reasons other than the tension.
 
The expression for the force is the same, whether the spring is considered massless or not. However, for a mass-spring system (i.e. a spring with uniformly distributed mass ms connected to a load mass m), the effective mass in dynamic relations (like oscillation period) of the combined spring-mass system is m + ms/3. That is, a third of the springs mass is included as part of the load mass in dynamic situations.
 
Thanks to the replies, but...

If the tension remains the same whether the spring is massless or not, then Newton's second law applied to the block alone is the same: -kx = mx'' which does not include the mass of the spring which is in contradiction with the concept of effective mass.

How can we apply Newton's second law on the system (Block alone) to the case when the spring is not massless?

Actually I know to obtain the effective mass m + ms/3 from energy consideration; my problem is how to obtain it from Newton's second Law applied to the block.
 
You can consider the spring as a continuous spring such that the displacement from the unloaded equilibrium is distributed along the spring length. This means you have to model the acceleration of the spring as a differential along the spring where the load mass is m+ms in the fixed end and just m in the freely moving end (where the load mass m is attached).
 
bgq said:
Actually I know to obtain the effective mass m + ms/3 from energy consideration; my problem is how to obtain it from Newton's second Law applied to the block.

You can't get the effective mass m + ms/3 from Newton's second law, because it is only an approximation. In the energy method you assume the displacement of the spring is the same as if it did not have any mass.

That is a reasonably good approximation if ms is small compared with m.

You can write a differential equation for the motion of the spring and find its eigenvalues and eigenvectors. That will give you an more "exact" solution.

The lowest eigenvalue will correspond to the approximate solution - a flexible heavy spring with a mass on the end has more than one mode of vibration. In fact the differential equation of motion you get using continuum mechanics has an infinite number of eigenvalues and vectors.
 
AlephZero said:
You can't get the effective mass m + ms/3 from Newton's second law, because it is only an approximation.

How?

What is the approximation?

How can apply Newton's 2nd Law to the block (not the spring)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K