How does an em wave propagate at the speed of light?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rakeshbs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Em Em wave Wave
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the propagation of electromagnetic (em) waves and the mechanisms that allow them to travel at the speed of light. Participants explore various interpretations, mathematical formulations, and analogies related to this phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that em waves can be produced by oscillating electric or magnetic fields but questions how they propagate at the speed of light.
  • Another participant explains that changes in electric and magnetic fields at one point cause changes at nearby points with a time delay, likening it to the movement of a point on a stretched string.
  • A different viewpoint suggests a visual interpretation of a photon as a charged particle attracted to its own electromagnetic fields, which induces the creation of another field in front of it, facilitating propagation.
  • One participant critiques the analogy of the photon, arguing it does not accurately capture the mechanism of propagation and emphasizes the importance of understanding the mathematical framework.
  • A mathematical representation of the wave equation is provided, indicating that any twice differentiable function can satisfy the wave equation, with sinusoidal waves being a specific solution.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of Maxwell's equations and the propagation of changes in the Coulomb field due to the acceleration of charges, noting that these changes must propagate at the speed of light.
  • It is mentioned that the radiation from an accelerating charge is not monochromatic and may not resemble a wave, suggesting complexity in the behavior of electromagnetic radiation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best way to conceptualize the propagation of em waves, with some favoring mathematical explanations while others prefer visual or analogical interpretations. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of mathematical understanding in grasping the concepts discussed, and there are indications of varying levels of familiarity with the underlying mathematics among contributors.

rakeshbs
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
How an em wave propogates??

i understand that an em wave can be produced due to an oscillating electric field or oscillating magnetic field... but how does this wave move forward at the speed of light??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Loosely speaking, when the electric and magnetic fields at some point change, it causes the fields at nearby points to change also, but with a time delay that depends on the distance. This is like when a point on a stretched string moves, it causes nearby points to move also, but with a time delay.

Mathematically speaking, the electric and magnetic fields each obey the classical differential wave equation,

<oops... see robphy's posting below for the correct equation :blushing: >

where c = 1 / \sqrt{\epsilon_0 \mu_0}

This can be proved from Maxwell's equations for the electric and magnetic fields, as was first done by Maxwell himself.
 
Last edited:
i Think you wanted a visual interpretation rather than mathematical? I like to this of a photon as a sort of charged particle, which is attracted to its own electromagnetic fields that it generates. The fields induce the creation of another one is front, the photon is attracted and propagates. This helps you remember that light is a particle and a wave, but shouldn't be taken too seriously.
 
I do not think that you analogy is a good one. It simply does not capture the mechanism well at all. Please reread JtBells explanation. It would be difficult to come up with a better one.

When you have acquired a better understanding of Mathematics you will be able to appreciate the formal mathematical statement. Meanwhile be careful about building incorrect visualizations as you will find that they can become a barrier to gaining a correct understanding.
 
\left( \frac {\partial^2 \vec E}{\partial x^2} + \frac {\partial^2 \vec E}{\partial y^2} + \frac {\partial^2 \vec E}{\partial z^2}\right) = {\color{red} \frac {1}{c^2}} \frac {\partial^{\color{red}2} \vec E}{\partial t^{\color{red}2}}
 
the thing is, it doesn't really have to oscillate; electromagnetic wave just have to satisfy the equation robphy posted and the physical situation one is in.

notice that any twice differentiable equation in the form of:
E_i=f(x_i-ct) + g(x_i+ct)
satisfy the wave equation.

the sinusoidal wave is just one simple solution of the wave equation.

consider:
E_y=\cos\left[ \frac{2\pi}{\lambda}(x+ct) \right]

which satisfy the wave equation. you can visualize the electric field pointing in the y-direction changes as x or time varies.
 
Last edited:
A somewhat simple minded explanation goes like: Maxwell's equations are not invariant with respect to acceleration of charges. When a charged particle accelerates. the Coloumb (near field in fact) changes. ( We are talking inertial frames here.) The Coloumb does not change instantaneously, rather any change must propagate at c. The accelerative radiation field is just the "delta Coloumb field'. That is, old Coloumb + radiation = new Coloumb. And then, turned around, the radiation field is necessary to keep the Coloumb field as the Coloumb field.

Note, also, that the radiation from an accelerating charge is not generally monochromatic, but rather has a superposition of frequencies, and, probably, does not even look like a wave.

I suspect that all the details of Coloumb + radiative adjustment can be worked out for a charge with uniform rotational mostion.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K