How and why are shock waves produced in breaking objects?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter autodidude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    produced Shock Waves
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the production of shock waves in breaking objects, specifically focusing on examples such as a pole vaulter's pole and the cutting of a pen. Participants explore the mechanisms behind these phenomena at both macroscopic and molecular levels, considering the implications for pain and damage experienced during such events.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that when a pole vaulter's pole breaks, the energy released causes oscillations that the vaulter feels, comparing it to a diving board's motion after use.
  • Another participant questions whether the breaking of the pole actually creates a shock wave, citing a lack of examples in existing literature.
  • Some participants propose that the initial break could initiate a shock wave that leads to further fractures in the pole, while others argue this may only apply to certain materials.
  • There is a discussion about the definition of shock waves, with one participant noting that they occur when a part of a substance travels faster than the speed of sound in that medium.
  • One participant mentions that cutting a pen results in increased pain due to the rigidity of shorter segments and suggests that this may be an accumulative effect rather than a direct result of shock waves.
  • Another participant raises the idea that oscillations, rather than shock waves, might be responsible for the pain experienced during these events.
  • There is a reference to a blog post discussing the propagation of shock waves in breaking objects, though its relevance to the current inquiry is questioned.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the correct terminology, particularly regarding the use of "shock wave" in the context of impacts on the human body.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether breaking objects produce shock waves or if oscillations are the primary concern. Multiple competing views remain regarding the definitions and implications of shock waves in different materials.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of defining shock waves and their occurrence in various materials, noting that certain conditions may lead to different outcomes. The discussion includes references to specific examples and analogies that may not universally apply.

autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
The example I have in mind is when a pole vaulter's pole breaks. I remember at last year's Olympics one of the commentators made a commenf about thw shock waves thag would've been traveling through the pole and the guy's hands when it broke.

I did a search and it was mentioned in some comments on YouTube that it would feel kind of like (but worse) hitting a something with a baseball bat but neither object breaking. Would whatever hurts your hands in this case be the same as the above?

And one more example...when I cut the inner plastic tube of a pen it started to hurt my fingers more and more as it got shorter (kept cuting it in half).

Assuming these are all shock waves, how are they caused? What would be going on at a molecular level at the breaking point? also, would they be able to do damage if you are close to but not touching the surface of the object?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
when you bend a pole vaulters pole you need to apply a force to bend it a certain amount and if it snaps that energy is released and the pole tries to go back to being straight but it does this by oscillating back and forth. The oscillation is felt by the pole vaulter as he tries to hold onto his pole.

A simple analogy is to look at a diving board after someone has dived off. It oscillates back and forth until the energy is dissipated.
 
autodidude, It’s important to always use the correct scientific terms when describing physical actions. I am not sure the breaking of a pole vaulter’s pole creates a shock wave. Although solids do support the propagation of a shock wave, I could find no example given on this Wikipedia page:

“A shock wave (also called shock front or simply "shock") is a type of propagating disturbance. Like an ordinary wave, it carries energy and can propagate through a medium (solid, liquid, gas or plasma)”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_wave

Hopefully some real physicist can enlighten us all: Does the breaking of a pole vaulter’s pole cause a shock wave to propagate in it?
 
Not sure if this is a good resource but this blog post forum discussion I found talks about one break initiating a shock wave that in turn causes other breaks in the pole.

Re: why poles break...
by Decamouse » Sun May 16, 2010 9:43 am

Lets assume perfect world first - pole is designed and vaulter vaults such that the stress is perfectly distributed throughout - - it would fail in multiple places at the same instant -- real world -- on a vault where the energy input into the pole is at or even exceeds it capabilty to store - a fraqcture/failure occurs - could even occur it a few spots nearly at the same time --- if you had a super high speed camera you would probably see that one spot fails first - and the shock wave of this added to the already highly stressed areas initiates the other breaks

I have seen in testing where you could get a many as fiften other fracture points (not complete failure of the composite - but failure of layers) --

...

from blog:

http://www.polevaultpower.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=19848#p142082
 
jedishrfu said:
when you bend a pole vaulters pole you need to apply a force to bend it a certain amount and if it snaps that energy is released and the pole tries to go back to being straight but it does this by oscillating back and forth. The oscillation is felt by the pole vaulter as he tries to hold onto his pole.

A simple analogy is to look at a diving board after someone has dived off. It oscillates back and forth until the energy is dissipated.

So after it breaks, it's oscillating and it's this oscillating that causes the pain?

Bobbywhy said:
autodidude, It’s important to always use the correct scientific terms when describing physical actions. I am not sure the breaking of a pole vaulter’s pole creates a shock wave. Although solids do support the propagation of a shock wave, I could find no example given on this Wikipedia page:

“A shock wave (also called shock front or simply "shock") is a type of propagating disturbance. Like an ordinary wave, it carries energy and can propagate through a medium (solid, liquid, gas or plasma)”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_wave

Hopefully some real physicist can enlighten us all: Does the breaking of a pole vaulter’s pole cause a shock wave to propagate in it?

Yeah, I'm not knowledgeable to know the difference yet though! :p

jedishrfu said:
Not sure if this is a good resource but this blog post forum discussion I found talks about one break initiating a shock wave that in turn causes other breaks in the pole.



from blog:

http://www.polevaultpower.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=19848#p142082

Thanks, I came across that when I did the search but I'm not it sure it really explains what I'm after
 
autodidude said:
And one more example...when I cut the inner plastic tube of a pen it started to hurt my fingers more and more as it got shorter (kept cuting it in half).
\Thanks

How were you cutting the pen? A shorter segment is more rigid and the natural frequency of oscillation would be higher. But the increased level of pain may be an accumulative effect.
 
You really need to think of the definition of a shock wave. That, afaik, is what happens when a part of a substance is forced to travel faster than the propagation of sound (wave propagation) in the medium. (As with the shock wave produced in supersonic flight). When an object is broken, the speed of part of the object would need to be faster than the wave speed in the substance. I guess this is possible if the shape of the break is suitable but I can't actually think of an example.
Shock waves do not last long when traveling in a medium - they slow down and become normal sound waves within a wavelength or so.
 
jedishrfu said:
Here's a related article with spaghetti as the breakee:

http://plus.maths.org/content/spaghetti-breakthrough?src=aop
What that article fails to make clear is that the secondary break is in the reverse direction. This shows that it is not the simultaneous failure hinted at by Decamouse, but rather a result of recoil.
 
  • #10
JustinRyan said:
How were you cutting the pen? A shorter segment is more rigid and the natural frequency of oscillation would be higher. But the increased level of pain may be an accumulative effect.

I used a pair of scissors. Ah, that makes sense.

sophiecentaur said:
You really need to think of the definition of a shock wave. That, afaik, is what happens when a part of a substance is forced to travel faster than the propagation of sound (wave propagation) in the medium. (As with the shock wave produced in supersonic flight). When an object is broken, the speed of part of the object would need to be faster than the wave speed in the substance. I guess this is possible if the shape of the break is suitable but I can't actually think of an example.
Shock waves do not last long when traveling in a medium - they slow down and become normal sound waves within a wavelength or so.

So then technically, it doesn't really make sense to speak of shock waves in breaking objects? It's actually these oscillations that have been mentioned that are dangerous?
 
  • #11
Perhaps you could say it's sometimes the initial shock wave that starts the fracture, then the local stress breaks the obhect further and further. The shock wave explanation probably only applies to certain (brittle) materials like ceramics and not to most metals.
 
  • #12
Sorry to bring this up again but I came across the usage of the term 'shock wave' again and not sure if it's the correct term. The context is the effects on impact on the human body during car crashes.

(~15:15)

'..the impact produces a shockwave that moves through the body similar to a sound wave moving through air...'

And he hits a gel with a mallet and there's a visible wave that moves through the gel - is that technically a shock wave? He also says the wave changes speed as it moves through the human tissue of differing densities producing 'complex wave interactions' that cause stress and strain in the tissues and organs.

What are these 'complex wave interactions' and how do they cause stress and strain?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
11K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K