How Are Polar and Cartesian Graphs of \( r = e^{\theta} \) Related?

gordonj005
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Consider the graph of [itex]r = e^{\theta}[/itex] in polar coordinates. Then consider the graph of [itex](\theta \cos{\theta}, \theta \sin{\theta})[/itex] where [itex]\theta \in \mathbb{R}[/itex] on the Cartesian plane (x - y axis). How are the two graphs related? What relationship (if any) can we define between [itex]e^{\theta}[/itex] and the trigonometric functions?

The Attempt at a Solution



What I considered was [itex]r^2 = x^2 + y^2[/itex] where [itex]x = \theta \cos{\theta}[/itex] and y = [itex]\theta \sin{\theta}[/itex]. Plugging this all in I get:

[tex]e^{2\theta} = (\theta)^2 ((\cos{\theta})^2 + (\sin{\theta})^2)[/tex]

which reduces to:

[tex]e^{2 \theta} = (\theta)^2[/tex]

taking the ln of both sides, noting that [itex]\theta \ne 0[/itex]:

[tex]2 \theta = 2 ln \theta[/tex]

[tex]\theta = ln \theta[/tex]

So as it stands now, the above equation has no real solutions. So I thought maybe putting each side as a power of e would be the relation between the two graphs.

[tex]e^{\theta} = e^{ln \theta}[/tex]

[tex]e^{\theta} = {\theta}[/tex]

which is kind of a circluar argument because I just rearranged the equation. They mention this has something to do with trigonometric functions, I'm not seeing the connection. I would apprectiate some help.
 
What you have done is define two equations, [tex]r^2 = \theta^2[/tex] and [tex]r = e^\theta[/tex]and then solve them simultaneously. The value of θ satisfying [tex]e^\theta = \theta[/tex]is simply where the two graphs intersect.
 
Yes, I realize this, but there are no real solutions to that equation. And also it doesn't tell me much about the relation between the two functions.
 
I have no idea about the rest of the problem, but I can tell you one thing. The curves do intersect. Just plot them. Show there is a solution to exp(t)=t+2*pi. You can find the root numerically if you want. Call it c. Now put c into the exponential and c+2*pi into the other curve. You'll get the same x,y coordinates. There are an infinite number of other similar solutions.
 
Last edited:
Oops, I omitted the negative sign! [tex]e^\theta = \theta[/tex] has no real roots, but [tex]e^\theta = -\theta[/tex] does!
 
Ah right you are, I thought that seemed weird that there were real intersection points but no solution. One thought i had was that if you take successive derivatives of [itex]r = e^{\theta}[/itex] you will get a tighter and tigher spiral. Eventually you should get the parametric function: [itex](\theta \cos{\theta}, \theta \sin{\theta})[/itex]. Any thoughts?
 
I've seen that before, its very nice. But does it have an application here?
 
gordonj005 said:
Ah right you are, I thought that seemed weird that there were real intersection points but no solution. One thought i had was that if you take successive derivatives of [itex]r = e^{\theta}[/itex] you will get a tighter and tigher spiral. Eventually you should get the parametric function: [itex](\theta \cos{\theta}, \theta \sin{\theta})[/itex]. Any thoughts?

Derivatives with respect to what? That doesn't sound right. I still don't quite get the point of this problem, I share that with you.
 
  • #10
Derivatives with respect to [itex]\theta[/itex]. I'm not sure, at this point I'm just grasping at answers. Any other thoughts?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K