Proof about sequence properties

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on using the Monotone Convergence Theorem to prove the Nested Interval Property. The Monotone Convergence Theorem states that a bounded, monotonically increasing or decreasing sequence converges. The Nested Interval Property asserts that for a closed interval [a,b], the intersection of nested closed intervals is non-empty. The proof involves constructing two sequences: one increasing from a to b and another decreasing from b to a, demonstrating that both sequences converge to a common point within the nested intervals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Monotone Convergence Theorem
  • Familiarity with the Nested Interval Property
  • Knowledge of sequences and their properties in real analysis
  • Basic concepts of boundedness in mathematical sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Monotone Convergence Theorem in real analysis
  • Explore examples of the Nested Interval Property in various mathematical contexts
  • Learn about the construction of sequences and their convergence behavior
  • Investigate other convergence theorems and their applications in analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, educators teaching convergence concepts, and anyone interested in the foundational properties of sequences and intervals.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Use the Monotone convergence theorem to give a proof of the Nested interval property.

Homework Equations


Monotone convergence theorem: If a sequence is increasing or decreasing and bounded then it converges.
Nested Interval property: If we have a closed interval [a,b] and we keep making intervals inside this and they keep getting smaller the union of all these intervals is non-empty and contains one element.

The Attempt at a Solution


If we started at the left endpoint of some closed interval and we had a monotonically increasing sequence and it continued on the to right with equally spaced steps, and we had a decreasing sequence that started from the right endpoint, eventually these 2 sequences will be heading towards each other and eventually reach the same common point. I think I need to be careful about how I pick the spacing between the terms in the sequence. Am I headed in the right direction with this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're doing ok. You indeed have to consider the sequence of end-points. This proves that there is an element in all the nested intervals.
 
Ok so let's say we have a closed interval [a,b] and we have a sequence that is increasing and it starts at a and steadily goes up to b in equal steps. Now let's take this same sequence and start it at b and run it backwards b going down to a. Now if we start at a and go up to b, and each time we move from a we also move from b so we have elements that are common to all intervals because they are enclosed inside each other because the sequence is steadily increasing and decreasing. Now we have to consider where the 2 endpoints are getting close to each other, these 2 sequences will eventually reach the same point because we constructed it from the same sequence. So there will be a point that is common to all intervals. let's assume that there wasn't a point that was common to all intervals. This would imply that there was a point where the 2 sequences jumped passed each other, but this couldn't happen because the 2 sequences would have to reach the same point because we constructed them this way to make that happen.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K