How can I calculate core losses given only frequency?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrp051680
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Frequency
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating core losses in magnetic materials at different frequencies, given known losses at 120Hz and 60Hz. Participants explore methods to separate eddy and hysteresis losses and seek a general approach to estimate losses at other frequencies without complete material information.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in calculating core losses at frequencies other than 120Hz and 60Hz, noting the need to separate eddy and hysteresis losses.
  • Another participant suggests a paper that may provide relevant information on core losses and the Steinmetz equation.
  • A participant mentions the lack of knowledge regarding maximum flux density (Bm) and core material, which complicates the calculation of constants needed for core loss equations.
  • One proposed approach models eddy current losses as proportional to B²f² and hysteresis losses as proportional to B¹.⁶f¹, acknowledging that these relationships may vary by material.
  • The same participant suggests that at constant voltage, flux is inversely proportional to frequency, leading to a derived formula that incorporates known data points to estimate losses at different frequencies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on a definitive method for calculating core losses at varying frequencies, and multiple approaches and uncertainties remain in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations due to missing information on core material properties and maximum flux density, which are essential for accurate calculations. The proposed relationships for losses are acknowledged as approximations that may not apply universally across different materials.

jrp051680
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I cannot seem to figure this out. I know total core losses at 120Hz and 60Hz are 100w and 32w respectively for some unknown constant ac voltage. I can't seem to figure out how to go about finding core losses at other frequencies or separating eddy and hysteresis losses. Can anybody shed some light on this for me?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I used the search terms: "core losses" steinmetz

and found this paper: http://people.clarkson.edu/~pillayp/c28.pdf

The paper and its references should help you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the reply. The problem I am having is that I don't know the max flux density Bm or what the core material is to be able to calculate Ke, Kh or n. There has to be a simple answer to this that I must be overlooking and its driving me crazy. Thanks for the link.
 
Is this a real world problem or an exercise (book problem)? I'd try the following approach for a somewhat simplistic (as in my not be completely accurate for a real world problem) solution.

The eddy current loss component is usually modeled as proportional to B^2 f^2 and the hysteresis loss component as proportional to B^{1.6} f^1. Here however the B^1.6 term is only a fairly rough approximation and different materials may use a slightly different constant (to 1.6) there. In any case, if we take the above relationships as correct then we can find a fairly simple solution.

P_L = k_1 B^2 f^2 + k_2 B^{1.6} f^1

It's also approximately true that at constant voltage the flux will be inversely proportional to frequency.

So,

P_L(n) = k_1 \left( \frac{B_1}{n} \right)^2 (n f_1)^2 +k_2 \left( \frac{B_1}{n} \right)^{1.6} (n f_1)^2

You don't know B but you do know that for a given voltage that B_1 is a constant so you can lump it (and f_1) with the constants k1 and k2 to get the above into a simple function of "n" (and of course the two lumped constants that you can determine from your two data points).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
4K