How Can I Compute exp(tA) Using Matrix A?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Unassuming
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential Matrix
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around computing the matrix exponential exp(tA) for a specific matrix A, which is given in a canonical form with complex eigenvalues and one distinct eigenvalue. Participants are exploring methods to approach this computation, including the use of series expansions and matrix decomposition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the series expansion for the matrix exponential and question how to simplify the components of the matrix A. There are attempts to break the matrix into commuting matrices and considerations of nilpotent matrices. Some participants express uncertainty about how to incorporate the variable t into their calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing various insights and approaches. Some have suggested diagonalization as a potential method, while others have pointed out that matrix A is not diagonalizable. There is a focus on finding a suitable form for exp(tA) and how it relates to the general solution of the system X'=AX.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the matrix A does not conform to expected summation patterns for the series, and there is a mention of specific calculations for higher powers of A. The discussion includes considerations of the implications of the matrix's structure on the computation of the exponential.

Unassuming
Messages
165
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A=[tex]\begin{bmatrix}-1 & 2 & 0\\-2 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -3\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
Use matrix A and compute exp(tA) explicitly.

Homework Equations


I am having trouble figuring out how to start this. I know how to look at each component of matrix A and to use exp(tA)=I+tA +...(exponential expansion) but I am not sure how to simplify each component's expansion. I don't know if there is an easier way to break matrix A up? Please help me to get started!

3.I have noticed that this matrix A is in canonical form with complex eigenvalues and 1 distinct eigenvalue -3. I tried to break this matrix up into 2 matrices (B and C) that commute so that exp(A)=exp(B)exp(C), but matrix C is a nilpotent matrix with all 0's except -3(bottom right corner) and matrix B has an alpha-beta block in the upper right left corner...

The attempt at a solution
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice [tex]\begin{bmatrix}-1 & 2 & 0\\-2 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -3\end{bmatrix} ^i = \begin{bmatrix}{((-1)^i (2i-1))} & {((-1)^{i-1} 2i)} & 0\\{(-1)^{i} 2i)} & {((-1)^i (2i-1))} & 0\\ 0 & 0 & (-3)^i\end{bmatrix}[/tex]. The series then is easily represented in a closed form.
 
Thank you for your help. Is the closed form the exp(A)? How do I incorporate t?
 
Yes, sorry, I meant, in a series, not closed form, hahah, do you need the actual sum?
 
yes please.
 
The actual sum would depend on element of the domain chosen where the image is to be evaluated.
 
I checked and noticed that matrix A does not follow component wise the given summation for the series since A[tex]^{3}[/tex]=[tex]\begin{bmatrix} 11&-2&0\\2&11&0\\0&0&-27\end{bmatrix}[/tex] and [tex]A^{4}[/tex]=[tex]\begin{bmatrix} -7&24&0\\-24&-7&0\\0&0&81\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

I have to be able to use exp(tA) to write the system X'=AX in a general solution form. Please help me to figure out how to write exp(tA).
 
u have to diagonalize the mx first
 
davyjones said:
u have to diagonalize the mx first
mx? There is no "mx" in the problem. If you meant A, the whole point of this problem is that you can't diagonalize A: it is not diagonalizable. Of course, you can separate the -3: obviously e[sups]A[/sup] will have e-3 3rd row 3rd column and 0s elsewhere on the third row and column.

The whole problem, then, is finding eB where B is the matrix
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc}-1 & 2 \\ -2 & -1\end{array}\right][/itex]<br /> That has determinant 5 so we can write it as <br /> [tex]5\left[\begin{array}{cc}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}} & \frac{2}{\sqrt{5}} \\ \frac{-2}{\sqrt{5}} & \frac{-1}{\sqrt{5}}\end{array}\right][/tex]<br /> and that matrix can be interpreted as a rotation matrix with [itex]cos(\theta)= -1/\sqrt{5}[/itex] and [itex]sin(\theta)= 2/\sqrt{5}[/itex]. ([itex]\theta[/itex] is about 116 degrees but that isn't important.)[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
I think I have part of the solution. I have [tex]e^{tA}[/tex].

Now I am asked to write the general solution in the form [tex]X(t)=e^{tA}X_0[/tex],

where [tex]X_0=X(0)[/tex].

I have figured the bulk of the work out, I just don't know exactly what form this is going to look like.

Will it look like this?

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}X_1(t) \\ X_2(t) \\ X_3(t) \end{bmatrix} = e^{tA} \begin{bmatrix} X_1(0) \\ X_2(0) \\ X_3(0) \end{bmatrix}[/tex].

EDIT: Also, should I plug that 0 in at some time for anything?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K