How can I convert game winning percentage to set winning percentage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dgonzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
  • #31
r=(2)*(p)*(1-p)
and that seemed to fix it. ie. odds of winning once at deuce is (2)*(p)*(1-p) because the two events can occur in either order.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Can you get to this?

P = p^4(\frac{15-34p+28p^2-8p^3}{1-2p+2p^2})
For the total probability of winning the game.
 
  • #33
ahh, I finally did. Took me a while to get that denominator throughout the fraction.

Thanks again all, very cool thread.
 
  • #34
I investigated tie-breaker games. These are tricky because the service keeps changing, so there are two parameters for the probability of winning a point.
Seems to me the easiest approach is to pretend that an even number of points is always played. This can result in scores like 8-2 instead of 7-2, but it doesn't matter. I used three transition probabilities
p = A wins both
q = one each
r = B wins both
p+q+r=1.
Having obtained a formula in p, q and r, I then eliminated q (this was the hard part).
Not counting the case of reaching 6-6, the expression has 21 terms!

The same approach (combining results in consecutive pairs) can be used to get from game probabilities to set probabilities.
 
  • #35
haruspex said:
I investigated tie-breaker games. These are tricky because the service keeps changing, so there are two parameters for the probability of winning a point.
Seems to me the easiest approach is to pretend that an even number of points is always played. This can result in scores like 8-2 instead of 7-2, but it doesn't matter. I used three transition probabilities
p = A wins both
q = one each
r = B wins both
p+q+r=1.
Having obtained a formula in p, q and r, I then eliminated q (this was the hard part).
Not counting the case of reaching 6-6, the expression has 21 terms!

The same approach (combining results in consecutive pairs) can be used to get from game probabilities to set probabilities.

For a set, I did it the same way:

P = probability of holding serve, Q = probability of breaking serve;

A = PQ (probability of winning two games)
B = P(1-Q) + Q(1-P) (winning one game)
C = (1-P)(1-Q) (losing both games)

Then, for winning a non-tie-break set, I got:

##P(Set \ without \ TB) = A^3 + 3A^3B + 6A^2B^2 + 3A^3C + 12A^3BC + 12A^2B^2C + 4A^2B^3 + 4AB^4##
##+ 6A^3C^2 + 12A^2B^2C + AB^4 + 30A^3BC^2 + 20A^2B^3C + AB^5##

##P(Tie-break) = 30A^2B^2C^2 + 20AB^4C + B^6##

The set formula would need to be extended (with p, q, a, b and c) to get the odds of winning the tie-break 7-5 or better. The tie-break formula is the same to get to 6-6 in the tie-break (with a, b, c); from where the odds of winning the tie-break are a/(1-b).

And, I think that's everything! Hopefully there are no typos.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
2K