How can I convert game winning percentage to set winning percentage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dgonzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting game winning percentages to set winning percentages in tennis. The original poster is exploring whether there is a shortcut equation for this conversion, given a specific game winning percentage of 0.67 for Player A.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various attempts to calculate set winning percentages using game winning percentages, including the use of Excel for simulations. There are considerations of binomial coefficients and the frequency of occurrences of different winning scenarios.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing calculations and questioning the assumptions behind their approaches. Some have suggested potential equations and methods, while others express confusion about specific aspects of the calculations, particularly regarding combinations and probabilities.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of specific game scenarios (e.g., 6-1, 6-2) and the need to consider the implications of winning sequences. Participants also note the complexity introduced by tie-breakers and the variability of point-winning probabilities based on serving conditions.

  • #31
r=(2)*(p)*(1-p)
and that seemed to fix it. ie. odds of winning once at deuce is (2)*(p)*(1-p) because the two events can occur in either order.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Can you get to this?

P = p^4(\frac{15-34p+28p^2-8p^3}{1-2p+2p^2})
For the total probability of winning the game.
 
  • #33
ahh, I finally did. Took me a while to get that denominator throughout the fraction.

Thanks again all, very cool thread.
 
  • #34
I investigated tie-breaker games. These are tricky because the service keeps changing, so there are two parameters for the probability of winning a point.
Seems to me the easiest approach is to pretend that an even number of points is always played. This can result in scores like 8-2 instead of 7-2, but it doesn't matter. I used three transition probabilities
p = A wins both
q = one each
r = B wins both
p+q+r=1.
Having obtained a formula in p, q and r, I then eliminated q (this was the hard part).
Not counting the case of reaching 6-6, the expression has 21 terms!

The same approach (combining results in consecutive pairs) can be used to get from game probabilities to set probabilities.
 
  • #35
haruspex said:
I investigated tie-breaker games. These are tricky because the service keeps changing, so there are two parameters for the probability of winning a point.
Seems to me the easiest approach is to pretend that an even number of points is always played. This can result in scores like 8-2 instead of 7-2, but it doesn't matter. I used three transition probabilities
p = A wins both
q = one each
r = B wins both
p+q+r=1.
Having obtained a formula in p, q and r, I then eliminated q (this was the hard part).
Not counting the case of reaching 6-6, the expression has 21 terms!

The same approach (combining results in consecutive pairs) can be used to get from game probabilities to set probabilities.

For a set, I did it the same way:

P = probability of holding serve, Q = probability of breaking serve;

A = PQ (probability of winning two games)
B = P(1-Q) + Q(1-P) (winning one game)
C = (1-P)(1-Q) (losing both games)

Then, for winning a non-tie-break set, I got:

##P(Set \ without \ TB) = A^3 + 3A^3B + 6A^2B^2 + 3A^3C + 12A^3BC + 12A^2B^2C + 4A^2B^3 + 4AB^4##
##+ 6A^3C^2 + 12A^2B^2C + AB^4 + 30A^3BC^2 + 20A^2B^3C + AB^5##

##P(Tie-break) = 30A^2B^2C^2 + 20AB^4C + B^6##

The set formula would need to be extended (with p, q, a, b and c) to get the odds of winning the tie-break 7-5 or better. The tie-break formula is the same to get to 6-6 in the tie-break (with a, b, c); from where the odds of winning the tie-break are a/(1-b).

And, I think that's everything! Hopefully there are no typos.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
2K