How Can I Evaluate This Integral of a Rational Function?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 4K views
y_lindsay
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
i'm trapped with a problem: [tex]\int\frac{dx}{x\sqrt{2-x-x^2}}[/tex].

i think this problem could be solved by subtitutions: [tex]\ x+\frac{1}{2}=\frac{3}{2}sint[/tex] and [tex]\ u=tan\frac{t}{2}[/tex].
and finally we would get an expression in [tex]\ u[/tex]: [tex]\frac{\sqrt{2}}{4} log\left|\frac{2\sqrt{2}+u-3}{2\sqrt{2}-u+3}\right|[/tex]
(am i right so far?)

however i find it difficult and tedious to write the result in x and get the final answer.

does anyone know how to evaluate this integral in an alternative way?

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
another question is how to evaluate the integral [tex]\int\frac{\sqrt{2-x-x^2}}{x^2}dx[/tex].
i used the method of integration by parts, anyone knows some smarter way to do it?
 
y_lindsay said:
i'm trapped with a problem: [tex]\int\frac{dx}{x\sqrt{2-x-x^2}}[/tex].

i think this problem could be solved by subtitutions: [tex]\ x+\frac{1}{2}=\frac{3}{2}sint[/tex] and [tex]\ u=tan\frac{t}{2}[/tex].

yes this is the correct substitution. my answer is slight different from yours, but it could be just me not doing it carefully, or they are actually the same but written in slightly different form. Anyway method is correct.
 
thanks mjsd.

i know that the method itself is correct, but it just seems a little tedious, especially when we need to write the final answer in variable x.

is there any other substitution we could use to attack this integral? or any alternative methods rather than the routine process to integrate rational function?
 
y_lindsay said:
thanks mjsd.

i know that the method itself is correct, but it just seems a little tedious, especially when we need to write the final answer in variable x.

is there any other substitution we could use to attack this integral? or any alternative methods rather than the routine process to integrate rational function?

when I have time I may try to do this again, but I do not believe it is overly complicated when you put it in terms of x. (well, that depends on your definition of "complicated"), you probably just got to know some tricks to simplify it.
 
It may be a tiny bit 'tedious' to write again in terms of x, but not difficult, and no where near as tedious as have doing that integral in the first place..

[tex]x+\frac{1}{2}=\frac{3}{2}\sin t[/tex] so [tex]\sin t = (x+\frac{1}{2})(\frac{2}{3}) = \frac{2x+1}{3}[/tex] hence, [tex]t= \arcsin \left(\frac{2x+1}{3}\right)[/tex]

So

[tex]u = \tan \left( \frac{\arcsin \left(\frac{2x+1}{3}\right)}{2} \right)[/tex].