How can I find the superposition of two vectors with a phase shift of pi/4?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the superposition of two vectors with a phase shift of π/4, specifically in the context of electromagnetic waves and their polarization. Participants are exploring how to express the resulting motion of the vectors without dependence on time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss methods to eliminate the time variable from the equations of the vectors. They explore trigonometric identities and transformations, questioning how to derive an elliptical motion from the given phase shift.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of various mathematical approaches, including the use of complex numbers and rotation transformations. Some participants express uncertainty about their progress, while others have made attempts to clarify their understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

One participant mentions the context of a undergraduate assignment involving the proposal of an exam question related to the polarization of electromagnetic waves, indicating a specific academic framework for the discussion.

Kazza_765
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
I'm considering the superposition of 2 vectors.

[tex]E_x=E_1cos(wt)<br /> E_y=E_2cos(wt+/pi/4)[/tex]

Trying to eliminate t. Its easy when the phase shift is 0 or pi/2 but I'm not sure how to go about it in this case. I can get Ey to be a function of cos(wt)-sin(wt), or cos(wt)sin(wt) just using trigonometric formulas, but I don't know where to go from there.

The end result should be an elipse with axis that are not aligned with the x-y axis. If its quite difficult then I won't worry about it. I just get the feeling that I've done this before and I should know it, but somethings not clicking. Thanks.


edit: For some reason the LATEX graphics don't appear for me. Just in case I put the formulas in wrong they should be:

Ex = E1 cos(wt)
Ey = E2 cos(wt + pi/4)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kazza_765 said:
I'm considering the superposition of 2 vectors.

[tex]E_x=E_1cos(wt)<br /> E_y=E_2cos(wt+\pi/4)[/tex]

Trying to eliminate t. Its easy when the phase shift is 0 or pi/2 but I'm not sure how to go about it in this case. I can get Ey to be a function of cos(wt)-sin(wt), or cos(wt)sin(wt) just using trigonometric formulas, but I don't know where to go from there.

The end result should be an elipse with axis that are not aligned with the x-y axis. If its quite difficult then I won't worry about it. I just get the feeling that I've done this before and I should know it, but somethings not clicking. Thanks.edit: For some reason the LATEX graphics don't appear for me. Just in case I put the formulas in wrong they should be:

Ex = E1 cos(wt)
Ey = E2 cos(wt + pi/4)
How about [tex]E = \sqrt{E_x^2 + E_y^2}[/tex]?

As far as the latex problem, you have to use lower case for the tex and /tex commands.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
How about [tex]E = \sqrt{E_x^2 + E_y^2}[/tex]?

As far as the latex problem, you have to use lower case for the tex and /tex commands.

AM

Thanks for the reply, I don't think I was very clear about what I'm trying to do though.

If I have
[tex]E_x=E_1cos(wt)[/tex]

[tex]E_y=E_2cos(wt)[/tex]

then [tex]E_1y=E_2x[/tex] gives me my equation of motion for the particle.

If
[tex]E_x=E_1cos(wt)[/tex]

[tex]E_y=E_2cos(wt + \frac{\pi}{2})[/tex]

then
[tex]E_y=-E_2sin(wt)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{x^2}{E_1}+\frac{y^2}{E_2}=1[/tex]

And the vector moves in an ellipse.

I'm not sure how to get the same sort of equation (ie. no dependence on t), or if its possible, for

[tex]E_x=E_1cos(wt)[/tex]

[tex]E_y=E_2cos(wt+\frac{\pi}{4})[/tex]

[tex]E_y=\frac{E_2}{\sqrt{2}}(cos(wt)-sin(wt))[/tex]

[tex]E_y^2=-E_2^2(cos(wt)sin(wt))[/tex]

Not sure where I can go from here
 
Last edited:
There's a rotation [transformation] involved.
Complex numbers might simplify your calculation.
 
I'm sorry but I'm still not sure how to get there.

If I write it as,

[tex]E_x=E_1e^{iwt}[/tex]
[tex]E_y=E_2e^{iwt}e^{\frac{\pi}{4}}[/tex]

I don't know where to go from here.

I feel like its staring me right in the face. I know what the answer should look like. I know the transform should be along the lines of [cosA,-sinA;sinA,cosA] and I could probably work out A by playing with E1 and E2, but its just not falling into place for me. Maybe I'm just having a bad day, hopefully a good night's sleep will help.
 
Just for clarification, I'll explain the context in which I ask this question. For a uGrad assignment I have been asked to propose an exam question and provide a solution (The hard part about this assignment is thinking of a question that hasn't already been on previous exams).

Part of my question goes along the lines of:
Consider 2 EM waves, prpagating along the z axis, with angular frequency w and wave number k. Wave 1 has its E-field aligned with the x axis, wave 2 with the y axis. There is a relative phase difference of [tex]\phi[/tex] between them. Describe how the polarisation of the superposition of waves 1 & 2 varies in time.

For the case [tex]\phi=0[/tex] we have a plane wave with an E-field of magnitude [tex]\sqrt{E_1^2+E_2^2}[/tex]. For all [tex]0 < \phi < \pi[/tex] we should have an elliptically polarized plane wave, but I only know how to demonstrate this for the case where [tex]\phi=\frac{\pi}{2}.[/tex]
 
Nevermind. Worked it out. Just wasn't thinking yesterday.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K